rd'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org
Subject: RE: Stock image woes
Ahhh.I just caught the morph in this new series of spams.
I'll write and test a new rule for it. Thanks for the examples.
--Chris
> -Orig
Title: RE: Stock image woes
Ahhh.I just caught the morph in this new series of spams. I'll write and test a new rule for it. Thanks for the examples.
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Baird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 200
Quoting Greg Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You are already sitting at 4 points here. Why don't you just up the SA
> score
> of either or both of these
>
> RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_XBL
>
> Problem solved.
Not really. The problem would indeed be solved for *this* example. However,
a lot o
AM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Stock image woes
>
>
> Quoting Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > As of this morning, then updated SARE stock rules have
> additions to catch
> > these. :)
> >
> > Ninj
Title: RE: Stock image woes
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Baird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:52 AM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Stock image woes
>
>
> Quoting Chris
Quoting Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As of this morning, then updated SARE stock rules have additions to catch
> these. :)
>
> Ninjas rule! (Except for the pink one. Which frieghtens us all.)
I upgraded to the new SARE stock ruleset (1.00.05) early this morning.
Unfortunately, there
Title: RE: Stock image woes
> -Original Message-
> From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 10:56 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Stock image woes
>
>
>
> All,
>
> Is anybody having any luck
wrote:
Is anybody having any luck with the Stock spam that consists of an
image and "noise" to through off bayes?
Yeah. The new sare_stocks ruleset is pushing
most of them over the threshold, and Bayes seems to be taking care of
the rest. (In my experience, Bayes poison doesn't seem t
