On Thursday, 6. April 2006 18:29, Matt Kettler wrote:
> If the guy is in your blacklist, can you just blacklist him at the MTA
> layer?
Yes, that would probably best. I just wanted to have any blacklists etc. in
one place (i.e. spamassassin) and not two.
> Erm, pre-process the message and feed o
Michael Frotscher wrote:
> On Monday, 3. April 2006 16:35, Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Are the messages involved over 250k? Unless you pass -s with a different
>> size, spamc will bypass scanning for any message over 250k.
>
> I was wondering about the same thing: I want to filter mails with large
> a
On Monday, 3. April 2006 16:35, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Are the messages involved over 250k? Unless you pass -s with a different
> size, spamc will bypass scanning for any message over 250k.
I was wondering about the same thing: I want to filter mails with large
attachments from a guy who is in my
nal Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:36 AM
> To: Michael Shuler
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Randomly Not Scanning Messages
>
>
> Michael Shuler wrote:
> > I am using Postfix and Spa
Michael Shuler wrote:
> I am using Postfix and Spam Assassin. For some reason some messages that
> are blatantly SPAM are not getting the X-Spam-Score added to them. They
> show that they are received by Postfix (in the header) but they are not
> scanned from what I can tell (X-Spam entries). Wh
