Re: Pyzor and cloudmark

2008-03-13 Thread Ben Poliakoff
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080313 07:59]: > > > > Is anyone using pyzor ? > > > > both server and client here yes > > looking at it now, I got no PYZOR catches last day :( FWIW, at our site PYZOR_CHECK fires on about 65% of all of our spam. We had a total of 7523 hits for P

Re: Pyzor and cloudmark

2008-03-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On Wed, March 12, 2008 16:19, R.Smits wrote: > > > Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ? On 13.03.08 15:44, Benny Pedersen wrote: > i am unsure if that is not just razor ? afaik it supports special features of commercial RAZOR version > > Is anyone using pyzor

Re: Pyzor and cloudmark

2008-03-13 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, March 12, 2008 16:30, R.Smits wrote: > I have just discovered DCC . > Looks a lot better :-) sure do, we are all here to help later even if it looks good later olso > Sorry i've asked. Benny Pedersen Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098

Re: Pyzor and cloudmark

2008-03-13 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, March 12, 2008 16:19, R.Smits wrote: > Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ? i am unsure if that is not just razor ? > Is anyone using pyzor ? both server and client here yes > We are looking at these add-ons for spamasssassin. Pyzor looks old... > (la

RE: Pyzor and cloudmark

2008-03-13 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! I have just discovered DCC . Looks a lot better :-) they are very different things. I advise using both (or, all three) Since I witnesed slow responses and timeouts from Pyzor (yes, also with the alternative server) I'd only recommend Razor2 and DCC. Has anyone got experience with the

RE: Pyzor and cloudmark

2008-03-13 Thread Rob Sterenborg
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 12.03.08 16:30, R.Smits wrote: >> Forget it >> >> I have just discovered DCC . >> Looks a lot better :-) > > they are very different things. I advise using both (or, all three) Since I witnesed slow responses and timeouts from Pyzor (yes, also with the alte

Re: Pyzor and cloudmark

2008-03-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.03.08 16:30, R.Smits wrote: > Forget it > > I have just discovered DCC . > Looks a lot better :-) they are very different things. I advise using both (or, all three) > > Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ? > > > > Is anyone using pyzor ? -- Matus U

Re: Pyzor and cloudmark

2008-03-12 Thread R.Smits
Forget it I have just discovered DCC . Looks a lot better :-) Sorry i've asked. Greetings... R.Smits wrote: > Hello, > > Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ? > > Is anyone using pyzor ? > > We are looking at these add-ons for spamasssassin. Pyzor looks o