Sanesecurity for use with spamassassin?
Many thanks
Sujit
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of René Berber
Sent: 30 July 2007 20:04
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with clamav plugin
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
I am using clamav
: Problem with clamav plugin
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> I am using clamav as our virus scanner on our mail gateway (exim).
> This seems to discard lot of e-mails. Is there any benefit of using
> clamav for spamassassin from Sanesecurity?
There's no such thing.
If you me
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> I am using clamav as our virus scanner on our mail gateway (exim). This
> seems to discard lot of e-mails. Is there any benefit of using clamav
> for spamassassin from Sanesecurity?
There's no such thing.
If you meant the plugin, the answer is no; Exim will st
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with clamav plugin
You need to set a high priority for the meta rules as otherwise they are
evaluated BEFORE the ClamAV plugin is used (I think?). I am not an
expert in
how SA works, but I eventually came up with the following solution (for
On 7/24/07, OliverScott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You need to set a high priority for the meta rules as otherwise they are
evaluated BEFORE the ClamAV plugin is used (I think?). I am not an expert
in
how SA works, but I eventually came up with the following solution (for
using several differen
On 07/24/07 15:43, OliverScott wrote:
full CLAMAV eval:check_clamav()
describe CLAMAV Clam AntiVirus detected something...
score CLAMAV 0.001
If you don't want CLAMAV to score (high), apparently you can rename it
to __CLAMAV, works fine here.
To make the meta rule work too, I had to giv
On 07/24/07 15:43, OliverScott wrote:
You need to set a high priority for the meta rules as otherwise they are
evaluated BEFORE the ClamAV plugin is used (I think?). I am not an expert in
how SA works, but I eventually came up with the following solution (for
using several different 3rd party c
You need to set a high priority for the meta rules as otherwise they are
evaluated BEFORE the ClamAV plugin is used (I think?). I am not an expert in
how SA works, but I eventually came up with the following solution (for
using several different 3rd party clamav signatures):
This is my clamav.cf
At 03:09 PM 12/21/2004, Cameron Bales wrote:
I'm running CGPSA 1.4f4 under Communigate 4.2.7 and SpamAssassin 3.0.1.
I've installed ClamAV 0.8 and the SpamAssassin ClamAV plugin as described
here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ClamAVPlugin
I get the following error in my mail headers:
X-Spa
