7;t get to play with spam all day :( ). If there are other people keen on doing this then maybe we can get a collaboration going.
R
From: Chris Santerre
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 March 2005
15:16To: Gray, Richard;
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: RE: Potential new auto-learning
There has
been a lot of talk about dynamic scoring. Most people argue that Bayes is a good
substitute for it already. But not if you don't use Bayes ;)
I think its a
worthy idea for testing. Although the logic could be fairly simple. Like using
the top hitting rules script in a cron job.
