On 1/26/23 09:02, giova...@paclan.it wrote:
MIMEDefang 2.84 will syntetize an header like:
by $hostname (envelope-sender $Sender) (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id
$MessageID"
even for authenticated emails while MIMEDefang 2.85+ will inject ESMTPA
header for authenticated emails.
This will change wh
On 1/26/23 08:51, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 1/26/23 08:23, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
So, I'm tempted to conclude that I don't need to mess with internal_networks,
msa_networks, and trusted_networks,
Not here
Ok.
clients submitting mail without authentication (which was very common
On 1/26/23 08:23, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
So, I'm tempted to conclude that I don't need to mess with
internal_networks, msa_networks, and trusted_networks,
Not here
Ok.
clients submitting mail without
authentication (which was very common >10 years ago and still persists
somewhere
On 1/25/23 12:37, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
just the headers should be enough.
You can also post headers on site like pastebin.
On 25.01.23 15:34, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Trying again, with fewer details...
Looking at a quarantined message, the only received header is (anonymized):
Rec
On 1/25/23 12:37, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
just the headers should be enough.
You can also post headers on site like pastebin.
Trying again, with fewer details...
Looking at a quarantined message, the only received header is (anonymized):
Received: from [192.168.xxx.xxx] (xxx-xxx-xxx-xx
On 1/24/23 19:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Can you post the Received: headers?
On 25.01.23 11:30, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
I'm trying...
I've prepared a long and detailed message, but it doesn't seem to come
through...
Curious if this simpler message will...
just the headers should be
On 1/24/23 19:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Can you post the Received: headers?
I'm trying...
I've prepared a long and detailed message, but it doesn't seem to come
through...
Curious if this simpler message will...
bye & Thanks
av.
>> Since the beginning of this year, however, incoming (SMTP authenticated)
>> mail from clients outside the LAN is marked as spam.
>> E.g.
>> > X-Spam-Score: 10.756 (**)
>>
BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_REJECT,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LOTSOFHASH,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,LOT
>>
S_OF_MONEY,PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP,RCV
On 1/23/23 17:53, Bill Cole wrote:
Hello.
SA4 has been in ports for a while. MD3.x should be but is not. This is
unlikely to be relevant to your problem.
Yes, I know, but on HEAD.
I'm using quarterly port branch (currently 2023Q1), otherwise, with so
frequent changes, maintenance would be
On 1/23/23 16:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
split inbound and outbound mail on different servers and run a dedicated
SA instance for submission port - clients don't have a business
connecting to port 25 at all
Thanks for answering.
Having two mail servers is something we have considered: while pos
On 2023-01-23 at 11:37:04 UTC-0500 (Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:37:04 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
Unfortunately SpamAssassin does not have set of rules to ignore for
outgoing mail, nor special scores for those.
This isn't quite true.
The *_networks parameters determine how
>
> >> Since the beginning of this year, however, incoming (SMTP authenticated)
> >> mail from clients outside the LAN is marked as spam.
> >> E.g.
> >> > X-Spam-Score: 10.756 (**)
> >>
> BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_REJECT,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LOTSOFHASH,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,LOT
> >>
> S_OF_MONEY,PDS_R
On 1/23/23 17:53, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2023-01-23 at 10:51:14 UTC-0500 (Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:51:14 +0100)
Andrea Venturoli
is rumored to have said:
Hello.
I've got a long standing server, where I run FreeBSD (13.1) + sendmail (8.17.1)
+ MIMEDefang (2.84) + SpamAssassin (3.4.6).
(I know there a
On 2023-01-23 at 10:51:14 UTC-0500 (Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:51:14 +0100)
Andrea Venturoli
is rumored to have said:
Hello.
I've got a long standing server, where I run FreeBSD (13.1) + sendmail
(8.17.1) + MIMEDefang (2.84) + SpamAssassin (3.4.6).
(I know there are more recent versions, but that's
Since the beginning of this year, however, incoming (SMTP authenticated)
mail from clients outside the LAN is marked as spam.
E.g.
> X-Spam-Score: 10.756 (**)
BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_REJECT,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LOTSOFHASH,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,LOT
S_OF_MONEY,PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_Z
> I've got a long standing server, where I run FreeBSD (13.1) + sendmail
> (8.17.1) + MIMEDefang (2.84) + SpamAssassin (3.4.6).
> (I know there are more recent versions, but that's what ports currently
> provide).
> This has been working perfectly for years.
yes time changes, currently gmail is so
16 matches
Mail list logo