RE: Issue with rules in 3.3.1

2010-12-28 Thread Jonas
> > I'm just trying to figure out how big a problem this is :) > > It's not a problem for you a an end user, just warnings. Please disregard. > > > Naturally I would like to have an error and warning free lint :) > > Some of the scores for rules above should have been wrapped with > ifplugin/end

Re: Issue with rules in 3.3.1

2010-12-28 Thread Mark Martinec
> Alright thanks for clearing that up, do you think the other warnings > about missing rules is also just sloppiness? The DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL*, ACCESSDB and SHORTCIRCUIT are fixed now, and SUBJ_RE_NUM removed: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6499 trunk (and 3.3, assuming

RE: Issue with rules in 3.3.1

2010-12-28 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Jonas wrote: From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org] On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Jonas wrote: I looks like jhardin disabled the old rules at some point early 2010, and made some newer ones with _NEW appended, but the file 50_scores.cf (downloaded from updates.spamassassin.

Re: Issue with rules in 3.3.1

2010-12-28 Thread Mark Martinec
Jonas, > config: warning: score set for non-existent rule > SANE_7429530a7398f43f1f1b795f9420714e > config: warning: score set for non-existent rule > SANE_91eb43f705d25c804374a746d7519660 > config: warning: score set for non-existent rule > SANE_04e8bf28eb445199a7f11b943c44d209 > config: warni

RE: Issue with rules in 3.3.1

2010-12-28 Thread Jonas
> -Original Message- > From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org] > Sent: 27. december 2010 20:43 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Issue with rules in 3.3.1 > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Jonas wrote: > > > I looks like jhardin disabled the

Re: Issue with rules in 3.3.1

2010-12-27 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Jonas wrote: I looks like jhardin disabled the old rules at some point early 2010, and made some newer ones with _NEW appended, but the file 50_scores.cf (downloaded from updates.spamassassin.org) still refer to the old, now disabled rules. That's just sloppiness on my p