Rick Macdougall wrote:
Randy wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing a massive increase in connection attempts since 7am EDT
this morning.
Most is being rejected because of not existing users but the majority
that is getting through is hitting
"Sanesecurity.Casino.11228.UNOFFICIAL".
Randy wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing a massive increase in connection attempts since 7am EDT
this morning.
Most is being rejected because of not existing users but the majority
that is getting through is hitting
"Sanesecurity.Casino.11228.UNOFFICIAL".
Back skatter? Someone
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing a massive increase in connection attempts since 7am EDT
this morning.
Most is being rejected because of not existing users but the majority
that is getting through is hitting
"Sanesecurity.Casino.11228.UNOFFICIAL".
I'm seeing this across 5 different s
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:08:08PM -0400, Steve Lake wrote:
> Oh, this sounds spectacular. One question. Is there a port on
> Freebsd for this? I don't see one offhand.
No there isn't. However, if you use ports to pull in
p5-String-Approx, graphics/netpbm, graphics/libungif,
graphi
Steve Lake wrote:
Oh, this sounds spectacular. One question. Is there a port on
Freebsd for this? I don't see one offhand. If there is, then that
would assume that all the other necessary ports are present as well. If
not, it'll be a royal b trying to get the nix versions insta
On 2006-10-15, Steve Lake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, this sounds spectacular. One question. Is there a port on
> Freebsd for this? I don't see one offhand. If there is, then that would
> assume that all the other necessary ports are present as well. If not,
> it'll be a roya
As beta it works very well. No crashes etc. It needs fine tuning to
make it more effective, though.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Lake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oh, beta. Hmm, I guess I'm going to have to hold off on
installing it then. I can't risk putting betas on a pr
Oh, beta. Hmm, I guess I'm going to have to hold off on
installing it then. I can't risk putting betas on a production server,
even if it is a small one. Do you know if they'll make an announcement
about it when it's released?
At 11:25 PM 10/14/2006 -0700, jdow wrote:
It's a few li
Steve Lake wrote:
> Oh, this sounds spectacular. One question. Is there a port
> on Freebsd for this? I don't see one offhand. If there is, then
> that would assume that all the other necessary ports are present as
> well. If not, it'll be a royal b trying to get the nix versions
It's a few lines of perl. Download it. Put the pieces in the appropriate
places. Go.
(The direct answer is "of course not." It's still beta and nobody has
done rpms, debs, or ports of it. There might now be a zip or tar file
of it.)
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Lake" <[EMAIL
Oh, this sounds spectacular. One question. Is there a port on
Freebsd for this? I don't see one offhand. If there is, then that would
assume that all the other necessary ports are present as well. If not,
it'll be a royal b trying to get the nix versions installed instead if
no
Use: http://helpdesk.qualispace.com
QualiSpace Community Discussion forum: http://forum.qualispace.com
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 12:35 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Increase in Spam
Clifton Royston
Clifton Royston wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:35:33PM +0530, Suhas (QualiSpace) wrote:
> > I have added those to the local.cf but doesn't seems to be working,
> > what could be the reason?
>
> These rule score adjustments depend on having added some of the SARE
> rules; I'm not sure which
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:08:23PM -0700, Max Clark wrote:
> Thanks - this is exactly what I was looking for.
>
> -Max
>
> On 10/12/06, Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Max Clark wrote:
> >> I have seen an increase in the amount of spam that has made its way
> >> through our filters and in to
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:35:33PM +0530, Suhas (QualiSpace) wrote:
> I have added those to the local.cf but doesn't seems to be working, what
> could be the reason?
These rule score adjustments depend on having added some of the SARE
rules; I'm not sure which set they're from.
-- Clifton
...
56 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Increase in Spam
Hi!
Max Clark said the following, On Friday 13 October 2006 04:57 AM:
> I have seen an increase in the amount of spam that has made its way
> through our filters and in to our inboxes. Most of this seems to be
> the stoc
Hi!
Max Clark said the following, On Friday 13 October 2006 04:57 AM:
I have seen an increase in the amount of spam that has made its way
through our filters and in to our inboxes. Most of this seems to be
the stock pitches that are image attachments. Is there any way to
effectively combat this?
Thanks - this is exactly what I was looking for.
-Max
On 10/12/06, Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Max Clark wrote:
> I have seen an increase in the amount of spam that has made its way
> through our filters and in to our inboxes. Most of this seems to be
> the stock pitches that are image at
Max Clark wrote:
I have seen an increase in the amount of spam that has made its way
through our filters and in to our inboxes. Most of this seems to be
the stock pitches that are image attachments. Is there any way to
effectively combat this?
Look into FuzzyOCR.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassa
19 matches
Mail list logo
