Re: Help with understanding a rule

2006-12-07 Thread Loren Wilton
Yes, you are probably right. But: there must be a reason why the rule no_real_name exists? Yes. It successfully HELPS to detect spam. It is not, on its own, a good method to detect spam. That is why it normally has a low score. And if there is a rule (written or not) that From: headers s

RE: Help with understanding a rule

2006-12-07 Thread Sietse van Zanen
I want the IT staff to change this, but they require some "proof" that the full name should be there(!). >That is definite proof of an incompetent IT staff..

RE: Help with understanding a rule

2006-12-07 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 5:54 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Help with understanding a rule > > " > Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 3.0 required) > > pts rule name