RE: Help analyzing the determination of spam

2005-01-24 Thread Chris Santerre
>-Original Message- >From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 10:56 AM >To: SPAMASSASSIN >Subject: Help analyzing the determination of spam > > >Nice subject! > >I attached a message to this email that got an incredibly low spam >score. >When I run th

RE: Help analyzing the determination of spam

2005-01-21 Thread Jason Gauthier
Thanks all, That does help quite a bit. We'll see how the weekend goes! Jason > -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 12:24 PM > To: Jason Gauthier; SPAMASSASSIN > Subject: Help analyzing the determination of spam > > At 10

RE: Help analyzing the determination of spam

2005-01-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I attached a message to this email that got an incredibly low spam > score. When I run the message through spamassassin -t it gets a > spam score as I would expect. > > I know I don't have much more details, but can anyone give me ideas > why? >