> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: zondag 20 maart 2005 5:18
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DCC License Change
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> > > I read
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> > I read through some of these postings at rhyolite.com. It sounds to me like
> > DCC should be off in SA by default going forward, or possibly completely
> > removed from SA future versions so users don't accidentally get in a
> > lic
ll it on my gateway today. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Bob Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 1:36 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DCC License Change
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> >Well, I guess this gives us a go
Greg Allen wrote:
> I read through some of these postings at rhyolite.com. It sounds to me like
> DCC should be off in SA by default going forward, or possibly completely
> removed from SA future versions so users don't accidentally get in a
> license/legal dispute without their knowledge.
Seems
ch 19, 2005 2:43 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: DCC License Change
I read through some of these postings at rhyolite.com. It sounds to me
like DCC should be off in SA by default going forward, or possibly
completely removed from SA future versions so users don't accidentall
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> >Well, I guess this gives us a good reason to finally get around to
> >writing our own hashing subsystem...
>
> Unfortunately that might not be a workable option Justin. The reason DCC
> is changing license is because it's infringing on a broad patent o
Justin Mason wrote:
Well, I guess this gives us a good reason to finally get around to
writing our own hashing subsystem...
- --j.
Unfortunately that might not be a workable option Justin. The reason DCC
is changing license is because it's infringing on a broad patent of
using hashes to automatic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:54:26AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > >imagine that it will affect me. Does anyone have any opinions on the
> > >licensing change?
> >
> > Basically the primary target is those specifically sell
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:54:26AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >imagine that it will affect me. Does anyone have any opinions on the
> >licensing change?
>
> Basically the primary target is those specifically selling managed
> services and appliances.
This was the first I've heard of a licens
Thomas Cameron wrote:
Has anyone been following the DCC license change thread on the DCC
mailing list? Is anyone going to be negatively affected by it?
I run a small mail server for my own small business, so I don't
imagine that it will affect me. Does anyone have any opinions on the
licensin
10 matches
Mail list logo
