If this issue is actually directly related to
intersessions.com/avspamfilter.com, it looks like you may need to obtain
a paid subscription at dnswl.org (as well as other DNSxL/URIxL lists you
want to have access to):
Terms and Conditions
*Users, Data Access and Subscriptions*
Every
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 08:16:15AM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 05:42:04PM -0400, Jeff Koch wrote:
> >
> > Hi:
> >
> > We're getting numerous false positives on 'RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL'. When I
> > check
> > these IP's (193.106.175.39, for example) at [1]https://www.dnswl.org t
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 05:42:04PM -0400, Jeff Koch wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> We're getting numerous false positives on 'RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL'. When I check
> these IP's (193.106.175.39, for example) at [1]https://www.dnswl.org they are
> NOT listed.
>
> * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Send
On 5/13/22 23:42, Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi:
We're getting numerous false positives on 'RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL'. When
I check these IP's (193.106.175.39, for example) at
https://www.dnswl.org they are NOT listed.
* -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at
https://www.dnswl.org/,
See below:
On 5/13/2022 8:41 PM, Arne Jensen wrote:
Den 13-05-2022 kl. 23:42 skrev Jeff Koch:
We're getting numerous false positives on 'RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL'.
When I check these IP's (193.106.175.39, for example) at
https://www.dnswl.org they are NOT listed.
* -5.0 RCVD_IN_DN
Den 13-05-2022 kl. 23:42 skrev Jeff Koch:
We're getting numerous false positives on 'RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL'. When
I check these IP's (193.106.175.39, for example) at
https://www.dnswl.org they are NOT listed.
* -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at
https://www.dnswl.org/,
Hi:
We're getting numerous false positives on 'RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL'. When I
check these IP's (193.106.175.39, for example) at https://www.dnswl.org
they are NOT listed.
* -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at
https://www.dnswl.org/, high
* trust
At 08:31 09-07-2009, Bob Proulx wrote:
I just wanted to confirm that I am seeing twitter invite spam that
appears AFAICT to be from twitter.com to addresses that are not and
never have been associated with Twitter. Mostly moderated mailing
lists. It looks to me like there is some type of interf
Am 2009-07-09 09:31:24, schrieb Bob Proulx:
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > Obviously, they are letting automated processes in.
>
> I just wanted to confirm that I am seeing twitter invite spam that
> appears AFAICT to be from twitter.com to addresses that are not and
> never have been associated w
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Obviously, they are letting automated processes in.
I just wanted to confirm that I am seeing twitter invite spam that
appears AFAICT to be from twitter.com to addresses that are not and
never have been associated with Twitter. Mostly moderated mailing
lists. It looks
> On 1-Jun-2009, at 05:52, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> I don't follow anyone on twitter.
>> Went to their web site for the first time last week to look for their
>> complaint address.
>
> I've never seen a mail from twitter that was not directed to my
> twitter account. I searched the entire mail
On 1-Jun-2009, at 05:52, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I don't follow anyone on twitter.
Went to their web site for the first time last week to look for their
complaint address.
I've never seen a mail from twitter that was not directed to my
twitter account. I searched the entire mailspool for th
> On 28-May-2009, at 14:57, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> why does a company that is so easy to spam through get a -8 point
>> pass?
>
> Because the only way to get a message from twitter is to 1) have an
> account on twitter 2) have someone who YOU ARE FOLLOWING send a direct
> message to you 3) ha
On 28-May-2009, at 14:57, Michael Scheidell wrote:
why does a company that is so easy to spam through get a -8 point
pass?
Because the only way to get a message from twitter is to 1) have an
account on twitter 2) have someone who YOU ARE FOLLOWING send a direct
message to you 3) have Twitt
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 16:57 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> why does a company that is so easy to spam through get a -8 point pass?
>
> , RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8,
>
> its WAY too easy to spam through twitter, from every idiot with a
> twitter page.
http://www.dnswl.org/
Promote for a lower lis
why does a company that is so easy to spam through get a -8 point pass?
, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8,
its WAY too easy to spam through twitter, from every idiot with a
twitter page.
belongs in the BRBL if you ask me.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[DKIM
16 matches
Mail list logo
