Federico Giannici wrote:
What about combining BlackListing and GreyListing?
I'm experimenting ab it with that right now. I've got my greylisting code to
use a configurable number of checks before it decides if the greylist should be
in use for an incoming connection. The idea is to avoid del
On Thu, November 2, 2006 17:03, Randy Smith wrote:
> I use policyd and give my users the ability to optout (or optin depending on
> the domain settings) of greylisting if they choose. They can do it through a
> plugin in SquirrelMail so, if they choose, they can turn it off for a few
> minutes to
On Fri, November 3, 2006 11:53, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> Due to the dynamic nature of this test, I guess that at least in the postfix
> case it should need to be somehow embedded into the greylisting server: it
> seems postfix doesn't allow to specify more than one policy server in the
> chec
> Federico Giannici wrote:
> > François Rousseau wrote:
> >> Greylisting is not always good...
> >>
> >> The greylisting insert delay in delevery and sometimes the email have
> >> to be delever fast.
> >
> > I don't trust enough DNSBLs to completely block an email only based on
> > them.
> >
>
Federico Giannici wrote:
François Rousseau wrote:
Greylisting is not always good...
The greylisting insert delay in delevery and sometimes the email have
to be delever fast.
I don't trust enough DNSBLs to completely block an email only based on
them.
What about combining BlackListing and
Federico Giannici wrote:
François Rousseau wrote:
Greylisting is not always good...
The greylisting insert delay in delevery and sometimes the email have
to be delever fast.
I don't trust enough DNSBLs to completely block an email only based on
them.
What about combining BlackListing a
> François Rousseau wrote:
> > Greylisting is not always good...
> >
> > The greylisting insert delay in delevery and sometimes the
> email have to
> > be delever fast.
>
> I don't trust enough DNSBLs to completely block an email only
> based on them.
>
> What about combining BlackListing an
François Rousseau wrote:
Greylisting is not always good...
The greylisting insert delay in delevery and sometimes the email have to
be delever fast.
I don't trust enough DNSBLs to completely block an email only based on them.
What about combining BlackListing and GreyListing?
I'd like to us
From: "Giampaolo Tomassoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Da: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I do is sort of partial greylisting. If a connection is suspicious
I give them a temp error on my lowest MX but accept them on higher MX
records. So that way most MTA will try a higher MX right away an
> Da: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What I do is sort of partial greylisting. If a connection is suspicious
> I give them a temp error on my lowest MX but accept them on higher MX
> records. So that way most MTA will try a higher MX right away and it
> doesn't add much of a delay.
Wel
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-1] Fran?ois Rousseau wrote:
> Greylisting is not always good...
>
> The greylisting insert delay in delevery and sometimes the email have to be
> delever fast.
>
> For example: on some public wireless network, you have to register to have
> access to the internet.
What I do is sort of partial greylisting. If a connection is suspicious
I give them a temp error on my lowest MX but accept them on higher MX
records. So that way most MTA will try a higher MX right away and it
doesn't add much of a delay.
François Rousseau wrote:
Greylisting is not always go
On Thursday 02 November 2006 08:42, François Rousseau wrote:
> Greylisting is not always good...
>
> The greylisting insert delay in delevery and sometimes the email have to be
> delever fast.
>
> For example: on some public wireless network, you have to register to have
> access to the internet.
Greylisting is not always good... The greylisting insert delay in
delevery and sometimes the email have to be delever fast. For
example: on some public wireless network, you have to register to have access
to the internet. You can access internet without authentification for 15
Greylisting is not always good... The greylisting insert delay in delevery and sometimes the email have to be delever fast. For example: on some public wireless network, you have to register to have access to the internet. You can access internet without authentification for 15 minutes. In this
> On 11/2/06, Debbie D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yes Chris I did notice.. my server was attacked with spam yesterday
> > morning.. it was coming from several different ip, so fast I
> could not keep
> > it quiet
> >
>
> There's been a lot of chatter about this:
>
> http://it.slashdot.or
> "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> >>I usually come home from work to find about 60-80 spam's in my spam
> >>folder.
> Today upon bringing up the mailer there were over 400! Looks like a large
> bonnet attack or something. Has anyone else noticed this? I've
> not finished
> look
17 matches
Mail list logo
