Re: R: R: AWL and whitelists

2006-10-28 Thread Roman Sozinov
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > >> >> In awl row: email|62.234|1|1.109 (e-mail|ip|count|score) >> >> Something strange: count is 1 still and score has become 1.109 :( >> > >> > What happened to the email|none row? Is it still there? >> > >> Yes it still there: >> email|62.234|1|1.109 (e-mail|ip

R: R: AWL and whitelists

2006-10-28 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> >> In awl row: email|62.234|1|1.109 (e-mail|ip|count|score) > >> Something strange: count is 1 still and score has become 1.109 :( > > > > What happened to the email|none row? Is it still there? > > > Yes it still there: > email|62.234|1|1.109 (e-mail|ip|count|score) You mean you don't have a

Re: R: AWL and whitelists

2006-10-27 Thread Roman Sozinov
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > >> 2. I do first test check: >> cat test-email | spamc -R >> Content analysis details: (-49.4 points, 5.0 required) >> pts rule name description >> -- >> -- >> 0.6 HTML_SHOR

R: AWL and whitelists

2006-10-27 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Hi all! > I don't understand something in AWL working and want somebody > clears it for > me. > I know that AWL is a score averaging system and it's bad idia to use it as > whitelist, but there is possibility --add-to-whitelist(-W) to add > e-mail to > AWL with -100 score. This possibility wor