RE: Quick question about local users

2005-11-01 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Rick Macdougall wrote: > Heh, with 20K high speed users we need to scan the outgoing mail for > spam and viruses or else we get listed in spamcop daily. So that > option is out the door. Then you should definitely spam-scan mail between your users as well (minus the RCVD_IN_*_DUL rules) -- Mat

Re: Quick question about local users

2005-11-01 Thread Rick Macdougall
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: Thanks, that's what I figured. I'll do some reading. I guess I'll want to set our users as internal and the mail server as trusted but I'll double check. Nah, just add everything to your trusted_networks. Hummm, not sure about that. I do

Re: Quick question about local users

2005-11-01 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Rick Macdougall wrote: Thanks, that's what I figured. I'll do some reading. I guess I'll want to set our users as internal and the mail server as trusted but I'll double check. Nah, just add everything to your trusted_networks. That will be fun for two full class /19's At most 46 charac

Re: Quick question about local users

2005-11-01 Thread Rick Macdougall
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: Is it possible to do anything about local users that are listed in RBL's - Use SMTP auth. SA 3.0.2+ will detect SMTP auth tokens and extend the trust boundary. - Use POP-before-SMTP and the SA 3.0 or 3.1 POPAuth plugins available on the Wik

Re: Quick question about local users

2005-11-01 Thread Rick Macdougall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: Is it possible to do anything about local users that are listed in RBL's ? Use SMTP AUTH, and bypass SpamAssassin checks on authenticated sessions? Heh, with 20K high speed users we need to scan the outgoing mail for spam and viruses or els

Re: Quick question about local users

2005-11-01 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Rick Macdougall wrote: Is it possible to do anything about local users that are listed in RBL's - Use SMTP auth. SA 3.0.2+ will detect SMTP auth tokens and extend the trust boundary. - Use POP-before-SMTP and the SA 3.0 or 3.1 POPAuth plugins available on the Wiki. - If you control these

Re: Quick question about local users

2005-11-01 Thread Rick Macdougall
Matt Kettler wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi, Is it possible to do anything about local users that are listed in RBL's ? The listing is correct but I don't really want mail sent to us from our users to be marked as spam (I know it wouldn't have if the date on the computer was set correctly b

RE: Quick question about local users

2005-11-01 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Rick Macdougall wrote: > Is it possible to do anything about local users that are listed in > RBL's ? Use SMTP AUTH, and bypass SpamAssassin checks on authenticated sessions? > The listing is correct but I don't really want mail sent > to us from our users to be marked as spam You need to find

Re: Quick question about local users

2005-11-01 Thread Matt Kettler
Rick Macdougall wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to do anything about local users that are listed in RBL's > ? The listing is correct but I don't really want mail sent to us from > our users to be marked as spam (I know it wouldn't have if the date on > the computer was set correctly but in this

Quick question about local users

2005-11-01 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, Is it possible to do anything about local users that are listed in RBL's ? The listing is correct but I don't really want mail sent to us from our users to be marked as spam (I know it wouldn't have if the date on the computer was set correctly but in this case it's my mother.) Headers