Re: Question regarding SA Integration wirg Amavisd-new

2004-11-05 Thread Gavin Cato
But that means that no-one would get virus checked. I want everyone to get AV'd, but not everyone wants to be spam filtered. Gav On 6/11/04 2:53 AM, "Kevin Peuhkurinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would seem more efficient yet to just have the calling MTA not call > amavisd for the domain

Re: Question regarding SA Integration wirg Amavisd-new

2004-11-05 Thread Kevin Peuhkurinen
It would seem more efficient yet to just have the calling MTA not call amavisd for the domains that you don't want checked, wouldn't it? Gavin Cato wrote: Hiya, I'm just trying this out on a test server. Is it possible to have amavisd only spamcheck the domains listed in @local_domains_acl? I've

Question regarding SA Integration wirg Amavisd-new

2004-11-05 Thread Gavin Cato
Hiya, I'm just trying this out on a test server. Is it possible to have amavisd only spamcheck the domains listed in @local_domains_acl? I've found that even for domains not listed in that array, that it still goes and runs the whole spamc checking process, even though it won't add the spam head