Re: Question about scoring and autolearning

On 4/18/19 9:05 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > On 18 Apr 2019, at 12:32, Sam wrote: >> I guess I’ll have to raise some scores to make it learn. > Reconsider. The message was clearly marked as spam with a score more than 6 > times the threshold. There is nothing here to train, SA did its job. You have a g

Re: Question about scoring and autolearning

On 18 Apr 2019, at 12:32, Sam wrote: > I guess I’ll have to raise some scores to make it learn. Reconsider. The message was clearly marked as spam with a score more than 6 times the threshold. There is nothing here to train, SA did its job. -- Light thinks it travels faster than anything but

Re: Question about scoring and autolearning

On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 19:56:25 +0200 Sam wrote: > Dear fellow SpamAssassin users, > > I’ve read everything I could find on scoring and autolearning before > posting here, and yet cannot figure why autolearn triggers properly in > the presence of ham but never triggers when SpamAssassin is fed spam.

Re: Question about scoring and autolearning

On 4/18/19 8:19 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > On 18 Apr 2019, at 11:56, Sam wrote: >> However, even with heavy spam, autolearn does not seem to engage in spam >> mode. > Why do you think it should? > > Did you check the message with spamassassin -D? > > You might want to read this: > >

Re: Question about scoring and autolearning

On 18 Apr 2019, at 11:56, Sam wrote: > However, even with heavy spam, autolearn does not seem to engage in spam > mode. Why do you think it should? Did you check the message with spamassassin -D? You might want to read this: --

Question about scoring and autolearning

Dear fellow SpamAssassin users, I’ve read everything I could find on scoring and autolearning before posting here, and yet cannot figure why autolearn triggers properly in the presence of ham but never triggers when SpamAssassin is fed spam. My global settings for SpamAssassin 3.4.2 launched from