R: R: Question about reporting

2007-05-19 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > > > Oh, really? > > > > So why I get a DCC_CHECK only after manually reporting (with > spamassassin > > -r) a spam? > > > I have no idea. > > Are you running a check *immediately* befor

Re: R: Question about reporting

2007-05-19 Thread Matt Kettler
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > Oh, really? > > So why I get a DCC_CHECK only after manually reporting (with spamassassin > -r) a spam? > I have no idea. Are you running a check *immediately* before calling spammassassin -r? If not, the difference is probably due to passage of time more than any

R: Question about reporting

2007-05-19 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > Dears, > > > > what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a > given > > threshold (say, 10-12)? > > > > Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or S

Re: Question about reporting

2007-05-18 Thread Matt Kettler
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > Dears, > > what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a given > threshold (say, 10-12)? > > Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or SC? > Razor, definitely. The Razor FAQ explicitly prohibits this. They want hand verified mail

R: Question about reporting

2007-05-18 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: venerdì 18 maggio 2007 18.19 > A: 'Spamassassin' > Oggetto: Re: Question about reporting > > Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > what's wrong with automatically SA-report mess

Re: Question about reporting

2007-05-18 Thread Kelson
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a given threshold (say, 10-12)? Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or SC? Razor discourages automatic reporting because they're concerned about false positives. They prefer verifi

R: R: Question about reporting

2007-05-18 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: venerdì 18 maggio 2007 16.34 > A: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Oggetto: Re: R: Question about reporting > > On Fri, May 18, 2007 15:29, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > >> 1)

Re: R: Question about reporting

2007-05-18 Thread Duncan Hill
On Fri, May 18, 2007 15:29, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: >> 1) Your server can be used in a DoS against the distributed services >> > > You mean, by sending valid content on high-scoring mails? Mmmh. Yes, this > may create trouble to DCC, Pyzor and Razor. Not to SC, since they are > mostly interest

R: Question about reporting

2007-05-18 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Fri, May 18, 2007 14:50, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > > what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a > given > > threshold (say, 10-12)? > > > > Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor,

Re: Question about reporting

2007-05-18 Thread Duncan Hill
On Fri, May 18, 2007 14:50, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a given > threshold (say, 10-12)? > > Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or SC? > > > I often see that high-scoring messages are reported as spam by some o

Question about reporting

2007-05-18 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
Dears, what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a given threshold (say, 10-12)? Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or SC? I often see that high-scoring messages are reported as spam by some of the above-mentioned engine, but seldom by all of them. Pl