Re: Question about getting a blacklist included in SA

2008-01-03 Thread Marc Perkel
Matthias Leisi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Kettler wrote: Comparatively speaking, 6 might be inadequate. I don't know how much of that scale is really "necessary" for minimal operation, and how much is just needed for scalability against DDoS attacks.

Re: Question about getting a blacklist included in SA

2008-01-03 Thread Matthias Leisi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Kettler wrote: > Comparatively speaking, 6 might be inadequate. I don't know how much of > that scale is really "necessary" for minimal operation, and how much is > just needed for scalability against DDoS attacks. dnswl.org runs on 10 servers

Re: Question about getting a blacklist included in SA

2008-01-03 Thread Matt Kettler
Per Jessen wrote: > Matt Kettler wrote: > > >>> What kind of bandwidth does it usually pull from servers when it is >>> part of the default distribution? >>> >>> I have 5 servers now at 3 locations and soon to add a 6th at a 4th >>> location. Is this enough? >>> >> For that, I have no clu

Re: Question about getting a blacklist included in SA

2008-01-03 Thread Per Jessen
Matt Kettler wrote: >> What kind of bandwidth does it usually pull from servers when it is >> part of the default distribution? >> >> I have 5 servers now at 3 locations and soon to add a 6th at a 4th >> location. Is this enough? > > For that, I have no clue.. probably not a lot of bandwidth, but

Re: Question about getting a blacklist included in SA

2008-01-02 Thread Marc Perkel
Matt Kettler wrote: Marc Perkel wrote: I was wondering about how to get a blacklist included in the SA distribution. I have a blacklist and whitelist that are both very good. I've been publishing it for about a year now. But I have a few questions. What are the licensing requirements that

Re: Question about getting a blacklist included in SA

2008-01-02 Thread Matt Kettler
Marc Perkel wrote: > I was wondering about how to get a blacklist included in the SA > distribution. I have a blacklist and whitelist that are both very > good. I've been publishing it for about a year now. But I have a few > questions. > > What are the licensing requirements that I have to give to

Re: Question about getting a blacklist included in SA

2008-01-02 Thread John D. Hardin
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Marc Perkel wrote: > Here's the info on my lists: > http://wiki.ctyme.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists Get somebody to proofread that page. -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTE

Question about getting a blacklist included in SA

2008-01-02 Thread Marc Perkel
I was wondering about how to get a blacklist included in the SA distribution. I have a blacklist and whitelist that are both very good. I've been publishing it for about a year now. But I have a few questions. What are the licensing requirements that I have to give to be included? I assume it