--On Friday, June 02, 2006 11:28 PM -0400 "Gary D. Margiotta"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep, but his original e-mail said mail/Lists was for ham training,
nothing about spam, so that's why I put that in there. It really was a
quick and dirty answer, and in his other reply, there's more folder
Thanks, that handles the top level. ;)
Yeah, it was quick and simple for just the one scenario you had in your
e-mail.
Me, I redirect mail using a combo of procmail and Postfix header checks to
2 users on the border servers (hamfilter and spamfilter), then I do 2
nightly script runs to sa-
Gary, doesn't that presuppose that the mail/lists directory does not
contain a spam list?
Yep, but his original e-mail said mail/Lists was for ham training, nothing
about spam, so that's why I put that in there. It really was a quick and
dirty answer, and in his other reply, there's more fold
Gary, doesn't that presuppose that the mail/lists directory does not
contain a spam list?
I also sense a lack of spam training here. One sided Bayes training is
not a good thing.
{^_^}
From: "Gary D. Margiotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#!/bin/sh
cd mail/Lists
for x in `ls`
do
sa-learn --ham --mbo
On Friday, June 02, 2006 10:51 PM -0400 "Gary D. Margiotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
# !/bin/sh
cd mail/Lists
for x in `ls`
do
sa-learn --ham --mbox $x
done
Thanks, that handles the top level. ;)
I figure I'll need to do something like:
find mail/Lists -type f -exec sa-learn --ham
#!/bin/sh
cd mail/Lists
for x in `ls`
do
sa-learn --ham --mbox $x
done
-Gary
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Friday, June 02, 2006 9:47 PM -0400 JamesDR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How many messages have you trained? You'll need 200 each to get it going,
and I recommen
On Friday, June 02, 2006 9:47 PM -0400 JamesDR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How many messages have you trained? You'll need 200 each to get it going,
and I recommend at least a thousand of each to really get it going.
I use procmail to distribute my mail to over a hundred folders in a large
tr
