Re: Problems with UNIX socket

2004-11-23 Thread Kris Deugau
Michael Barnes wrote: > Also, it seems easier and more flexable to just use the default TCP > socket instead of a UNIX socket. I'm not familiar with any > advantages of using a UNIX socket over a TCP one. Speed. If you're at the limits of your hardware, and you need to squeeze a bit of extra per

Re: Problems with UNIX socket

2004-11-23 Thread Michael Barnes
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:25:28AM -0600, Jon Dossey wrote: > > Setup: Redhat FC2, sendmail 8.13.1, spamassassin 3.0.1, and > spamass-milter 0.2.0 > > Error: Nov 23 11:21:45 hostname spamd[3966]: Can't unlink > /var/run/spamd.socket: Permission denied > > Here's the info on the socket: > srw-rw-

Problems with UNIX socket

2004-11-23 Thread Jon Dossey
Setup: Redhat FC2, sendmail 8.13.1, spamassassin 3.0.1, and spamass-milter 0.2.0 Error: Nov 23 11:21:45 hostname spamd[3966]: Can't unlink /var/run/spamd.socket: Permission denied Here's the info on the socket: srw-rw-rw- 1 spamd root0 Nov 23 11:21 spamd.socket And worth noting: spam