ent: Monday, November 14, 2005 11:24 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problems with DomainKeys
On Mon, November 14, 2005 12:09 pm, Matt Rossiter wrote:
> I am running FreeBSD 5.4 with the latest version of SpamAssassin
3.1.0.
> I'm also using Mimedefang 2.54. Spamassassin wa
On Mon, November 14, 2005 12:09 pm, Matt Rossiter wrote:
> I am running FreeBSD 5.4 with the latest version of SpamAssassin 3.1.0.
> I'm also using Mimedefang 2.54. Spamassassin was installed from a
> recently updated version of /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/.
>
> I am having a hard time f
I am running FreeBSD 5.4 with the latest version of SpamAssassin 3.1.0. I’m also
using Mimedefang 2.54. Spamassassin was installed from a recently updated
version of /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/.
I am having a hard time figuring out how
to fix this problem when I run ‘spamass
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 01:10:05PM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> For those of your that are installing Mail::DomainKeys. Please keep the
> following in mind.
>
> The domain keys plugin is experimental. One of the primary reasons it is
> experimental is because the Mail::DomainKeys mo
Thanks for the additional info, Jason!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Well, I don't expect much from it anyway, but wanted to see if there's any
advantage from using it/if it works (basically). It's only Yahoo using
DomainKeys, aren't they?
I wouldn't even say Yahoo is using it:
dig _domainkey.yahoo.com txt
_domainkey.yahoo.com. 585
Michael Parker wrote on Sat, 02 Jul 2005 13:10:05 -0500:
> The domain keys plugin is experimental. One of the primary reasons it is
> experimental is because the Mail::DomainKeys modules are very immature.
Well, I don't expect much from it anyway, but wanted to see if there's any
advantage from
Nick Leverton wrote on Sat, 2 Jul 2005 16:55:09 +0100:
> OpenSSL::RSA != Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA.
I figured that, but I didn't come up with the correct module name. It
appears I didn't try Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA, but only Crypt::OpenSSL or
something. It built ok now and there are no DomainKeys errors
Howdy,
For those of your that are installing Mail::DomainKeys. Please keep the
following in mind.
The domain keys plugin is experimental. One of the primary reasons it is
experimental is because the Mail::DomainKeys modules are very immature.
I encourage anyone who wishes to work with the Domai
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 05:16:24PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> So, OpenSSL::RSA is installed, but "Crypt" isn't. Ahm, what package does
> it belong to? "m Crypt" or "m Crypt::OpenSSL" just tells me it doesn't
> exist.
OpenSSL::RSA != Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. I found that I needed the latter.
Hav
I want to try it out, but it won't install correctly. One of the
prerequisites, OpenSSL, fails some tests. So I forced a cpan install for
OpenSSL. It may be working now or not, I don't know. But there's obviously
another prerequisite I'm missing (or it's the wrong one, anyway):
[19734] warn: plu
11 matches
Mail list logo
