On 08/03/06 06:17 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:07:50PM -0600, subscribed-lists wrote:
What's broken?
Mar 8 17:01:11 enoch spamd[13279]: Argument "a" isn't numeric in pack
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 711,
line 46.
http://issues.
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:07:50PM -0600, subscribed-lists wrote:
> What's broken?
>
> Mar 8 17:01:11 enoch spamd[13279]: Argument "a" isn't numeric in pack
> at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 711,
> line 46.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?i
Have you run "spamassassin --lint"? What does it tell you.
Have you run "spamassassin -d --lint"? What does it tell you.
How are you running spamd? Does it bear any resemblance to what you would
get (as a user not root) with the above two commands?
Barring this you have included no information t
On 08/03/06 06:07 PM, subscribed-lists wrote:
The following just blew past in my maillog. This doesn't seem to be an
isolated incident.
# grep Util.pm /var/log/maillog | wc -l
22581
What's broken?
Nothing really.
==
Mar 8 17:01:11 enoch spamd[13279]: Argum
The following just blew past in my maillog. This doesn't seem to be an
isolated incident.
# grep Util.pm /var/log/maillog | wc -l
22581
What's broken?
==
Mar 8 17:01:11 enoch spamd[13279]: Argument "a" isn't numeric in pack
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8