I changed the path just in case. It was that way as a mistake anyhow.
Here is the output of lint. (it is exactly the same as with the other
paths so I am sure that is not the issue.) Note that it works there.
Although not when run through procmail. I think your idea about users is
on to somethi
At 04:10 PM 9/24/2004, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
I do not believe that is an issue. It only puts the bayes databases at
~/.spammer_toks and ~/.spammer_seen. sa-learn has not had a problem
loading the databases. They have grown everytime I have used it. I can't
see why spamd would have a problem with
I do not believe that is an issue. It only puts the bayes databases at
~/.spammer_toks and ~/.spammer_seen. sa-learn has not had a problem
loading the databases. They have grown everytime I have used it. I can't
see why spamd would have a problem with it.
Tom
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 03:40 PM 9/2
At 03:40 PM 9/24/2004, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
bayes_path ~/.spammer
This statement is invalid if a directory named ".spammer" exists in the
user's home..
Please read the docs on bayes_path VERY carefully. Despite being named
"path" it's really "path, plus filename prefix".
Thus bayes_path should
I am having a problem with 2.63 not using bayes. (NB: setup is using
individual data and triggering using .4ward, procmail and postfix with
no individual .sa and .procmail files) I have trained each of three
accounts with over 1000 ham and some 48K spam messages. SA is working
and tagging spam
