Re: Position of X-Spam headers

On 05.07.23 04:38, Robert Senger wrote: > Thanks for the hint that the milter is responsible for that. Found > a > little patch for spamass-milter that fixed this. Am Mittwoch, dem 05.07.2023 um 10:20 +0200 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: note that the headers that appear first in the message

Re: Position of X-Spam headers

Am Mittwoch, dem 05.07.2023 um 14:50 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > *nothing* should touch existing headers as you also have multiple > Reveived-headers Good point. So, it seems that spamass-milter is doing things a bit, well, unconventional... I thought this is the case to not confuse later

Re: Position of X-Spam headers

Am Mittwoch, dem 05.07.2023 um 10:20 +0200 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: > On 05.07.23 04:38, Robert Senger wrote: > > Thanks for the hint that the milter is responsible for that. Found > > a > > little patch for spamass-milter that fixed this. > > note that the headers that appear first in the

Re: Position of X-Spam headers

On 05.07.23 04:38, Robert Senger wrote: Thanks for the hint that the milter is responsible for that. Found a little patch for spamass-milter that fixed this. note that the headers that appear first in the message are considered trusted, while those below do not. That's why most of milters put

Re: Position of X-Spam headers

Thanks for the hint that the milter is responsible for that. Found a little patch for spamass-milter that fixed this. Regards, Robert Am Dienstag, dem 04.07.2023 um 19:45 -0400 schrieb Jared Hall: > On 7/4/2023 7:38 PM, Robert Senger wrote: > > is there a reason why spamassassin adds its "X-Spa

Re: Position of X-Spam headers

Hi Jared, I am using spamass-milter. Robert Am Dienstag, dem 04.07.2023 um 19:45 -0400 schrieb Jared Hall: > On 7/4/2023 7:38 PM, Robert Senger wrote: > > is there a reason why spamassassin adds its "X-Spam ..." headers to > > the > > bottom of the header block, not to the top like every other m

Re: Position of X-Spam headers

On 7/4/2023 7:38 PM, Robert Senger wrote: is there a reason why spamassassin adds its "X-Spam ..." headers to the bottom of the header block, not to the top like every other mail filtering software (e.g. opendkim, opendmarc, clamav ... ) does? Can this behavious be changed? Mine are at the top, b

Position of X-Spam headers

Hi all, is there a reason why spamassassin adds its "X-Spam ..." headers to the bottom of the header block, not to the top like every other mail filtering software (e.g. opendkim, opendmarc, clamav ... ) does? Can this behavious be changed? Regards,  Robert -- Robert Senger

Position of X-Spam-Headers

Hi, just installed the new version and found the position of the X-Spam-Headers between the "received"-lines.. Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:55:05 +0200 Received: from mail by lara.gay-web.de (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) with spam-scanned (Exim 4.51) id 1E