>> Perhaps something like:
>>
>> - a higher priority MX is up
>> - the mail was delivered from a secondary MX with little or no delay
Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My concern was primarily for the secondary, where you don't know the delay
> until you forward. Are you saying that
--On Sunday, September 05, 2004 2:15 PM -0700 Daniel Quinlan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's also not just enough to ping the higher priority MX peers because
the spam checker might be running on the primary MX only so it would
only receive delayed mail from the backup MXes once it was back up.
P
Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, but by my quick test here it would help a bit. 0.22% of my spam and
> 9% of my missed spam was sent via my secondary MX.
Oops, that 0.22% is the number of _missed_ spam messages that hit the
rule out of all of my spam. It's about 8% of my spam ov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Has anyone written a plugin for SA3 that pings the higher-priority MX
> > peers for a domain and boosts the spam score if they're up?
>
> No, but by my quick test here it woul
Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone written a plugin for SA3 that pings the higher-priority MX
> peers for a domain and boosts the spam score if they're up?
No, but by my quick test here it would help a bit. 0.22% of my spam and
9% of my missed spam was sent via my secondary
Has anyone written a plugin for SA3 that pings the higher-priority MX peers
for a domain and boosts the spam score if they're up?
