Re: Per-user capabilities

2004-11-04 Thread jdow
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > However you should examine what proportion of mail nowadays, arriving from > > the internet, *is* addressed to multiple users in the one SMTP > > transaction. This may appear to be a major failing, but in my experience > > it's just not, in real-world

Re: Per-user capabilities

2004-11-03 Thread Loren Wilton
> However you should examine what proportion of mail nowadays, arriving from > the internet, *is* addressed to multiple users in the one SMTP > transaction. This may appear to be a major failing, but in my experience > it's just not, in real-world use. In my experience, virtually all multi-addres

Re: Per-user capabilities

2004-11-02 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Khalid Waheed writes: > SpamAssassin has all sorts of per-user capabilities, including whitelists, > rule weights, and Bayesian filtering. > But all of this stuff is totally useless in some mail servers (e.g. > SunOne messaging serv

Re: Per-user capabilities

2004-11-02 Thread jdow
From: "Khalid Waheed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > SpamAssassin has all sorts of per-user capabilities, including whitelists, rule weights, and Bayesian filtering. > But all of this stuff is totally useless in some mail servers (e.g. SunOne messaging server), for the simple

Per-user capabilities

2004-11-02 Thread Khalid Waheed
SpamAssassin has all sorts of per-user capabilities, including whitelists, rule weights, and Bayesian filtering. But all of this stuff is totally useless in some mail servers (e.g. SunOne messaging server), for the simple reason that being able to process mail for multiple users simultaneously