On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:13:24 -0500, Lindsay Haisley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 06:46 -0700, jdow wrote:
>> You will have to wait for up to a day for the Prolexic block to go
>> away.
>
>I got blocked for checking out their anti-DDoS measures. The block went
>away in about 1
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 06:46 -0700, jdow wrote:
> You will have to wait for up to a day for the Prolexic block to go
> away.
I got blocked for checking out their anti-DDoS measures. The block went
away in about 15 minutes.
--
Lindsay Haisley |"Fighting against human | PGP public key
FM
From: "Phil Barnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday 28 June 2007 15:22, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file. Basically, th
On Thursday 28 June 2007 17:02, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> I don't know what would be gained by a random wait.
The idea of a random wait for contention resolution is long standing. It's
built into the TCP/IP protocol for example.
For example, say my cron job runs at 3 am. Lot's of them probably
On Thursday 28 June 2007 16:39, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:33:43PM -0500, Larry Starr wrote:
> > Do I need to remove the rules, in /etc/mail/spamassassin, to prevent the
> > older rules from overriding any updates that may come in?
>
> Yes.
I suspected as much.
Thank you,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:33:43PM -0500, Larry Starr wrote:
> Do I need to remove the rules, in /etc/mail/spamassassin, to prevent the
> older
> rules from overriding any updates that may come in?
Yes.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"I lost my foo." - Theo
pgpgySBNRd9Tg.pgp
Des
I have a question regarding this.
I have set up the sa_update channel for the SARE rules and run it.
Everything worked OK BUT, I notice that sa_update is installing the rules
in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007, while rulesdujour was instaling them in
"/etc/mail/spamassassin".
Do I need to remove
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:46 -0400, Phil Barnett wrote:
> I'm going to try this, but with a 5 minute wait. I run it in the middle of
> the
> night anyway, who cares how long it takes.
>
> Actually, the proper response might be a random wait.
The HTML that gets sent by SARE is:
If this were
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 23:18 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > sa-update and rules_du_jour deal with different rules repositories.
> I
> > use both.
>
> sa-update can use both, if I'm not mistaken. I distantly remember
> configuring it to do so.
http://saupdates.openprotect.com/ has instructions
On Thursday 28 June 2007 15:22, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
> which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
> sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file. Basically, this patch
> greps the downloaded file fo
Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:39 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> Why not just use sa-update and not deal with this?
>
> sa-update and rules_du_jour deal with different rules repositories. I
> use both.
sa-update can use both, if I'm not mistaken. I distantly remember config
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:39 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Why not just use sa-update and not deal with this?
sa-update and rules_du_jour deal with different rules repositories. I
use both.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "In an open world,| PGP public key
FMP Computer Services |who nee
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:22:32PM -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
> which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
> sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file.
Why not just use sa-update and not deal wi
Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file. Basically, this patch
greps the downloaded file for the string "META HTTP-EQUIV", which should
never occur in a v
At 10:52 AM Monday, 6/18/2007, Lindsay Haisley wrote -=>
--lint has failed so it'll run properly next time.
--- /root/rules_du_jour.orig2007-06-17 21:01:24.0 -0500
+++ /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour 2007-06-18 12:37:44.0 -05
It seems as if the problem HTML redirect page is hiding somewhere when
rules_du_jour gets to its SA lint check, and it doesn't show up until
the rollback is done, so the patch I sent earlier isn't effective. I'll
need to read the code more thoroughly and don't have time now, so here's
a quicker-n-
16 matches
Mail list logo
