Re: Partial solution: Question about RelayCountry

2008-07-11 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Thursday, Jul 10th 2008 at 23:22 -, quoth Matt Kettler: =>Actually it is functionally correct as is written. It doesn't matter what the =>added header is name, unless you wish to be pedantic about semantics. => =>The rules check X-Relay-Countries, which is an internal pseudo-header created

Re: Partial solution: Question about RelayCountry

2008-07-10 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Steven W. Orr wrote: > I dug deeper into the problem of why I was not getting the > X-Spam-Relay-Countries header added to my mail, and I think I understand > things a bit better. (The goal is to see what countries the few false > negatives are going through.) > > First of all

Re: Partial solution: Question about RelayCountry

2008-07-10 Thread Matt Kettler
Steven W. Orr wrote: I dug deeper into the problem of why I was not getting the X-Spam-Relay-Countries header added to my mail, and I think I understand things a bit better. (The goal is to see what countries the few false negatives are going through.) First of all, the correct add_header com

Partial solution: Question about RelayCountry

2008-07-10 Thread Steven W. Orr
I dug deeper into the problem of why I was not getting the X-Spam-Relay-Countries header added to my mail, and I think I understand things a bit better. (The goal is to see what countries the few false negatives are going through.) First of all, the correct add_header command seems to not be: