Re: ABORT PROPOSED: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rc1.proposed1

2009-12-22 Thread Mark Martinec
On Sunday December 20 2009 15:31:19 Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Maybe a suggestion for the section COMPATIBILITY WITH 3.2.5. > Mention that the FreeMail plugin is now included, so needs to be removed > from older config. It's mentioned as a new plugin in the middle of the > release notes, but as this plu

Re: ABORT Re: PROPOSED: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rc1.proposed1

2009-12-21 Thread Jens Schleusener
Hi Warren, On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, Warren Togami wrote: On 12/18/2009 08:57 PM, Warren Togami wrote: This will be released if we go three days without an objection as per build/README procedure. At that point these archives will be renamed to "rc1" and the announcements will go out. Please su

Re: ABORT PROPOSED: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rc1.proposed1

2009-12-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Warren, for the next releases until RTM, can we keep the spamassassin.spec at real_version 3.0.0 instead of adding the release type? I usually do a full make and make test run, but then build an rpm and install that. If the real_version contains non-digits other than a dot that fails, so each t

ABORT Re: PROPOSED: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rc1.proposed1

2009-12-19 Thread Warren Togami
On 12/18/2009 08:57 PM, Warren Togami wrote: This will be released if we go three days without an objection as per build/README procedure. At that point these archives will be renamed to "rc1" and the announcements will go out. Please suggest improvements to this announcement text as well. H

PROPOSED: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rc1.proposed1

2009-12-18 Thread Warren Togami
This will be released if we go three days without an objection as per build/README procedure. At that point these archives will be renamed to "rc1" and the announcements will go out. Please suggest improvements to this announcement text as well. Hey users list, now would be a very good time t