Is actually not a FP on the rules.
The rules are right, and newegg created a messed up email (and their
whois IS invalid)
No spam filter is 100% accurate for 100% of the people.
That is what manually training is for (because folks like newegg doen't
seem to care they create messed up emails)
Di
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:43:32AM -0500, David B Funk wrote:
> Saw a FP on a shipping notice from newegg.com, largely due
> to PRIORITY_NO_NAME & RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID
I've also seen some problems with Newegg transactional mail, probably
the same rules. Stuck it aside t
Saw a FP on a shipping notice from newegg.com, largely due
to PRIORITY_NO_NAME & RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID
Headers were:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 00:09:59 2006 -0500
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from star.its.uiowa.edu (star.its.uiowa.edu [128.255.56.186])
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
>> X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at mailsnare.net
>> X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at mailsnare.net
>> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.892 tagged_above=3 required=9
>> tests=BAYES_00, MSGID_DOLLARS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,
>> RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME, SPF_PASS
From: "Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Friday 23 June 2006 16:59, Chris Santerre took the opportunity to write:
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and that this is just you trying to
be a perfectionist due to your swedish watchmaking gene. ;)
You mean Swiss watch-making gene? We S
On Friday 23 June 2006 16:59, Chris Santerre took the opportunity to write:
>
> I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and that this is just you trying to
> be a perfectionist due to your swedish watchmaking gene. ;)
You mean Swiss watch-making gene? We Swedes aren't primarily famous for making
w
tivirus: avast! (VPS 0625-7, 06/23/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at mailsnare.net
X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at mailsnare.net
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.892 tagged_above=3 required=9 tests=BAYES_00,
MSGID_DOLLARS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME, RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME,
mailsnare.net
> X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at mailsnare.net
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.892 tagged_above=3 required=9
> tests=BAYES_00, MSGID_DOLLARS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,
> RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: *
> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0625-7, 06/23/2006), Inbound me
roduced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0625-7, 06/23/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at mailsnare.net
X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at mailsnare.net
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.892 tagged_above=3 required=9 tests=BAYES_00,
MSGID_DOL
On Freitag, 23. Juni 2006 21:50 markwolk wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.892 tagged_above=3 required=9
> tests=BAYES_00, MSGID_DOLLARS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,
> RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME, SPF_PASS
I've looked in the rules:
RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME hits (among others) when
no "X-Ma
er by Mailsnare or Runbox SMTP, to another of my domains.
Messages received by Mailsnare arrive with the following
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.892 tagged_above=3 required=9 tests=BAYES_00,
MSGID_DOLLARS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME, RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME, SPF_PASS
Messages received by Runbox arrive with the foll
Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: markwolk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 5:53 AM
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: How to avoid MSGID_DOLLARS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,
>> RATWA
markwolk wrote:
PRIORITY_NO_NAME,
RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME and have often high spam scores.
How can I send emails that do not trigger these remarks?
You could always try using a name...
Title: RE: How to avoid MSGID_DOLLARS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME, RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME
> -Original Message-
> From: markwolk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 5:53 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: How to avoid MSGID_DOLLARS, P
On Freitag, 23. Juni 2006 11:52 markwolk wrote:
> ..triggers MSGID_DOLLARS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,
> RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME
> I use Outlook Express 6 and all of my IE is 100% legal
> How can I send emails that do not trigger these remarks?
If that's true, it's a bug in thes
regularly to check that everything works OK.
Recently I noticed that most test emails I am sending to various accounts
arrive with the mentions MSGID_DOLLARS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,
RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME and have often high spam scores.
How can I send emails that do not trigger these remarks?
I use Outlook
.
Recently I noticed that most test emails I am sending to various accounts
arrive with the mentions MSGID_DOLLARS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,
RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME and have often high spam scores.
How can I send emails that do not trigger these remarks?
I use Outlook Express 6 and all of my IE is 100% legal
Hallo und guten Tag Matt,
Heute (am 22.06.2005 - 16:21 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
>>what means "tests=[PRIORITY_NO_NAME=X]" (X as example) in the
>>header exactly?
> First, it means that SA matched the message against the PRIORITY_NO_NAME
> rule, and gave it x points
At 10:10 AM 6/22/2005, Jim Knuth wrote:
Hello @all ,
what means "tests=[PRIORITY_NO_NAME=X]" (X as example) in the
header exactly?
First, it means that SA matched the message against the PRIORITY_NO_NAME
rule, and gave it x points as a result.
As for what PRIORITY_NON_NAME
Hello @all ,
what means "tests=[PRIORITY_NO_NAME=X]" (X as example) in the
header exactly?
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867
PGP Fingerprint:
54C9 1A46 D3B2 95B6 454D
74FA AC73 773E 1F78 066F
--
Zufalls-Zitat
--
Ga
20 matches
Mail list logo
