t
spewing like a firehose, we need to stop that quickly.
> But yeah, i think John underestimates how difficult it is to do
> outbound filtering for more than a few dozen users who expect their
> mail to be delivered immediately, for some value of immediately.
Yup. We still get support ti
On Oct 29, 2013, at 9:31 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
> "John R. Levine" wrote:
>
>> But outbound filtering is far more useful when it, you know, actually
>> works.
>
> Outbound filtering is far trickier than inbound
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
"John R. Levine" wrote:
> But outbound filtering is far more useful when it, you know, actually
> works.
Outbound filtering is far trickier than inbound filtering. Unless you
really want to annoy your customers, you have to hold suspec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in using SpamAssassin and would like to know if anyone
has used it for
outbound filtering.
For example:
I would like the ability to filter messages by domain. To prevent being
blacklisted by
AOL or such companies, I would like to filter outbound
ges to the SpamAssassin
box..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in using SpamAssassin and would like to know if anyone
has used it for
outbound filtering.
For example:
I would like the ability to
I'm interested in using SpamAssassin and would like to know if anyone has
used it for
outbound filtering.
For example:
I would like the ability to filter messages by domain. To prevent being
blacklisted by
AOL or such companies, I would like to filter outbound email destined to
AOL for
