Scott Lockwood wrote:
> Is that per user? So, if I nuke the whitelist, this should go away?
>
> On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 17:37 +0100, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> >
> > USER_IN_WHITELIST !
Keep in mind that this is not referring to the auto whitelist. This is
a hit from one of the whitelist_from or
Hi!
Is that per user? So, if I nuke the whitelist, this should go away?
Anyone have any ideas???
USER_IN_WHITELIST !
Thats a bit depending on your setup. But trashing it would be a nice idea,
most people dont use the whitelist anyway. I dont...
Bye,
Raymond.
Is that per user? So, if I nuke the whitelist, this should go away?
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 17:37 +0100, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-79.4 required=5.0
> > tests=BAYES_99,HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC,
> > HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 17:35, Scott Lockwood wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-79.4 required=5.0
> tests=BAYES_99,HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC,
> HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
> RCVD_IN_XBL,SPF_SOFTFAIL,UPPERCASE_25_50,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no
> version=3.1
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:35 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Odd score
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-79.4 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_99,HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC,
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
RCVD_IN_XBL,SPF_SOFTFAIL,UPPERCAS
Hi!
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-79.4 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_99,HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC,
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
RCVD_IN_XBL,SPF_SOFTFAIL,UPPERCASE_25_50,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no
version=3.1.1
I keep getting these messages with really low scores t
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-79.4 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_99,HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC,
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
RCVD_IN_XBL,SPF_SOFTFAIL,UPPERCASE_25_50,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no
version=3.1.1
I keep getting these messages with really low scores that sho