Re: Not scoring high enough on this spam...

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andrew Hearn wrote: http://pastebin.ca/961075 I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of message over 5.0? I have some "stupid HTML tricks" rules for empty tag pairs; adding

Re: Not scoring high enough on this spam...

Andrew Hearn wrote: http://pastebin.ca/961075 I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of message over 5.0? thanks! Andrew If you learn the message which = 3.5 wouldn't that put the score +5?

Re: Not scoring high enough on this spam...

Andrew Hearn wrote: http://pastebin.ca/961075 I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of message over 5.0? thanks! Andrew pts rule name description -- --

Not scoring high enough on this spam...

http://pastebin.ca/961075 I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of message over 5.0? thanks! Andrew