Re: Not doing checks

2006-08-14 Thread Scott Ryan
Found the problem: skip_rbl_checks was set to 1. Set it to 0 and it be now catching spammers... ;) Thanks On Monday 14 August 2006 18:00, Scott Ryan wrote with regard to - Re: Not doing checks : > On Monday 14 August 2006 17:55, Theo Van Dinter wrote with regard to - Re: &g

Re: Not doing checks

2006-08-14 Thread Scott Ryan
On Monday 14 August 2006 17:55, Theo Van Dinter wrote with regard to - Re: Not doing checks : > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 05:41:40PM +0200, Scott Ryan wrote: > > [11431] dbg: check: > > tests=AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_I > >N_SORBS_DUL,

Re: Not doing checks

2006-08-14 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 05:41:40PM +0200, Scott Ryan wrote: > [11431] dbg: check: > tests=AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID > [29351] dbg: check: tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 > > Whis is it not doing as many checks as the FC5 machin

Not doing checks

2006-08-14 Thread Scott Ryan
I have SA3.1 installed on my fedora machine and 3.1 (built from fedora SRPM) on a RedHat Enterprise Linux 4 box . The fedora machine identifies a message as spam, but the redhat one lets it through. The only difference in the configs is basically, the redhat machine use MySQL for prefs where the