On Samstag, 24. Juni 2006 00:06 Brian Godette wrote:
> Which basically means you've never trained or autolearned on airmiles
> rewards ham, which we happen to see a fair number of
That could be, as I sit here in Vienna, Austria, Europe, and my main
language is german. Lots of things seem to be di
On Friday 23 June 2006 15:28, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> Are you sure about that? It would have to be a message that was ham,
> have (nearly) the same content, autolearn must be on and the message
> must have been learned. That's a lot of "if...and.." statements. I use
> sitewide bayes (hand trained
On Freitag, 23. Juni 2006 21:58 Brian Godette wrote:
> Also note that a large amount of your score was from
> DCC, Razor, and URIBLs that didn't hit at the initial receipt of this
> message.
Yes, another reason to use greylisting *g* If I counted correct, it
should still - but just - have been ma
On Friday 23 June 2006 13:24, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Freitag, 23. Juni 2006 20:56 Brian Godette wrote:
> > Spammer is using a ham corpus message and including the entire plain
> > text inside an HTML comment (<-- -->).
>
> Seems to be "pas problem" for SA:
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.9 requ
On Freitag, 23. Juni 2006 20:56 Brian Godette wrote:
> Spammer is using a ham corpus message and including the entire plain
> text inside an HTML comment (<-- -->).
Seems to be "pas problem" for SA:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99=3.5,DCC_CHECK=2.17,
DIGEST_MULTIP
So far this is the first time I've seen this be used.
Spammer is using a ham corpus message and including the entire plain text
inside an HTML comment (<-- -->).
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by mailhost.idcomm.com (Pos
