Steve Lake wrote:
Those razor2 and pyzor checks look interesting, but I haven't
seen them on any of my emails that get filtered. Is that something
special you have to setup, or is it a default feature of SA?
The spamassassin wiki, as well as manual pages are full of information
abo
Karl Auer wrote:
>
> It might be a bad idea, but I've set the score for BAYES_00 to zero.
> It seemed to me that the only emails (other than VERY short ones)
> that ever got a zero Bayes rating were spams :-) and the -4.9 that
> BAYES_00 gives by default seemed more than excessive.
>
> Anyway, my
Those razor2 and pyzor checks look interesting, but I haven't seen
them on any of my emails that get filtered. Is that something special you
have to setup, or is it a default feature of SA?
Steven Lake
Owner/Technical Writer
Raiden's Realm
www.raiden.net
A friendly web community
At 06:19 AM 12/10/2006 -0800, John Rudd wrote:
The Botnet plugin seems to catch the vast majority of them here. Have you
tried it?
Nope, been considering it though. I did check my spam bin and it
appears that only about one in twenty of those advice spams are getting
through, so tha
On Sunday 10 December 2006 16:31, John Rudd wrote:
> It can be downloaded from:
>
> http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/Botnet.tar
Thanks, John. I downloaded it and installed it earlier today. It appears to be
working fine, but I got with this tonight when RulesDuJour ran:
RulesDuJour
