On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Jeff Chan muttered drunkenly:
> On Wednesday, December 1, 2004, 8:17:14 AM, Ronan Ronan wrote:
>> how do i check whether SA is using
>> the locally stored file or whether is still querying the surbl.org DNS?
>> Is there an easy way if your not a bind / DNS guru?
>
> A dig may
On Wednesday, December 1, 2004, 8:17:14 AM, Ronan Ronan wrote:
> how do i check whether SA is using
> the locally stored file or whether is still querying the surbl.org DNS?
> Is there an easy way if your not a bind / DNS guru?
A dig may tell what name server it thinks it's using.
Jeff C.
--
Je
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Ronan wrote:
Ok well I hounded or DNS guys to finally put multi.surbls.org into the
dns(as a master), watched him HUP named and then
should i notice a difference??
im still getting 10+ seconds scantime on some messages..
how do i tell if its working?
well granted i sh
Ronan wrote:
Ok well I hounded or DNS guys to finally put multi.surbls.org into the
dns(as a master), watched him HUP named and then
should i notice a difference??
im still getting 10+ seconds scantime on some messages..
how do i tell if its working?
message size issues???
if you can trap on
Rick Beebe wrote:
Ronan wrote:
Hey list,
I am in the quite sureal situation of being given a blank
cheque by my boss to buy 2 new servers for SA. They were so
impressed with the upgrade to v3 + SURIBLS et al that when i said
that our current setup was hitting load max they found some cas
Ronan wrote:
Hey list,
I am in the quite sureal situation of being given a blank
cheque by my boss to buy 2 new servers for SA. They were so impressed
with the upgrade to v3 + SURIBLS et al that when i said that our
current setup was hitting load max they found some cash for me... :D
We
>Subject: RE: New Hardware
>Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:42:02 -0800
>From: "Gary W. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Ronan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, spam
>
>We use 4 single processor machines 2.8ghz P4 HT and we are doing
>150k per day now without breaking a s
Per Jessen wrote:
> Depending on your setup, you can probably do without heartbeat. Why not just
> have simple 50/50 load-sharing? We have a 64-node SA cluster working like
> this - only individual servers such as the master node run in an HA setup.
Forgot to say - these are all dual-processor
Ronan wrote:
> Which one will be better suited to SA? I know SA is more cpu/ram than
> disk IO so im leaning more toward the AMD approach. The reason there are
> 2 machines of each is because im gonna implement fail over using
> heartbeat.
Depending on your setup, you can probably do without hea
the nodes for maintenance without any customer impact
at all.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Ronan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 4:29 AM
> To: spam
> Subject: New Hardware
>
> Hey list,
> I am in the quite sureal situatio
Ronan wrote:
> What Im currently looking at is either 2 Sun v150s or 2
> dual-opterons probably with a gig each, and the standard 80+gigs.
> Which one will be better suited to SA? I know SA is more cpu/ram
> than disk IO so im leaning more toward the AMD approach.
I would recommend going with Linu
You might also look at Solaris X86. I've just brought up such a box,
and am impressed with the performance relative to Linux on the same box.
jay
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:28:35 AM, Ronan Ronan wrote:
Hey list,
I am in the quite sureal situation of being given
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:28:35 AM, Ronan Ronan wrote:
Hey list,
I am in the quite sureal situation of being given a blank cheque by my
boss to buy 2 new servers for SA. They were so impressed with the
upgrade to v3 + SURIBLS et al that when i said that our current
Ronan
I'd go for dual opteron V20z if you want to stick with sun kit.
Will outperform the Sparc based stuff.
no need to heart-beat, just have the two machines on same MX value and
DNS will load balance for you.
Would be interesting to see how Solaris 10 compares with Linux in this
environment -
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:28:35 AM, Ronan Ronan wrote:
> Hey list,
> I am in the quite sureal situation of being given a blank cheque by
> my
> boss to buy 2 new servers for SA. They were so impressed with the
> upgrade to v3 + SURIBLS et al that when i said that our current setup
Hey list,
I am in the quite sureal situation of being given a blank cheque by my
boss to buy 2 new servers for SA. They were so impressed with the
upgrade to v3 + SURIBLS et al that when i said that our current setup
was hitting load max they found some cash for me... :D
We are in a university
16 matches
Mail list logo
