Are Henry's versions of these rules different to what Jack posted below, and if so, where can I find them? I'm still running SA
3.1.8 (unable to upgrade yet) so I wouldn't receive them if you've pushed them to the 3.2 sa-update.
Cheers,
Jeremy
"Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messa
Justin Mason wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateKeyNotCrossCertified
bingo! thanks.
(wonder why do a rm on the sa-update-keys dir didn't fix that)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Main: 561-999-5000, Office: 561-939-7259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
Winner 2008 Techno
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateKeyNotCrossCertified
--j.
Michael Scheidell writes:
> > From: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:51 +0100
> > To: Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: Ne
On Thursday 17 April 2008 6:15 am, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > From: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:51 +0100
> > To: Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: Need help with bobax rules
> >
&g
> From: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:51 +0100
> To: Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Need help with bobax rules
>
>
> for what it's worth, I just pushed Henry's version of Joe's rules
for what it's worth, I just pushed Henry's version of Joe's rules into the
3.2.x sa-updates.
--j.
Jack Pepper writes:
> Quoting Jeremy Fairbrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > HI Jack,
> > Any chance of sharing your rules for this?!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jeremy
>
> Sure:
>
> score BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2
Quoting Jeremy Fairbrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
HI Jack,
Any chance of sharing your rules for this?!
Cheers,
Jeremy
Sure:
score BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2 1.800
header BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2 ALL =~
/^Message-Id:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/m
describe BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2 Has Bobax Generated Message-Id, type 2
score
HI Jack,
Any chance of sharing your rules for this?!
Cheers,
Jeremy
"Jack Pepper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This info popped up on the emerging-Threats list. I have watched our
mail servers and have confirmed that it works.
The problem is that my attempts
Quoting Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jack Pepper writes:
I guess I don't need those rules. I see now that INVALID_MSGID was
already catching them.
apologies for the noise on the list.
I found my problem in the faq. I was missing the "m" on the end ogf
the regex:
score BOBAX_GEN
Jack Pepper writes:
> I guess I don't need those rules. I see now that INVALID_MSGID was
> already catching them.
>
> apologies for the noise on the list.
Henry Stern has added rules to SpamAssassin 3.3.0 trunk SVN to implement
these. maybe he plans to backport them to 3.2.x sa-updates ;)
-
I guess I don't need those rules. I see now that INVALID_MSGID was
already catching them.
apologies for the noise on the list.
jp
--
Framework? I don't need no steenking framework!
@fferent Security Labs: Isolate/Insulate/In
This info popped up on the emerging-Threats list. I have watched our
mail servers and have confirmed that it works.
The problem is that my attempts to create Spamassin rules for it never
fire off. Can I get some tutelage from the list on creating rules for
these unique conditions:
Messa
12 matches
Mail list logo