Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
> Folks,
> I checked my last 20,000 spam emails and found that 250 of them had
> bogus "X-Mozilla-Status" headers. I have found no instances
> of these
> headers in ham, although I admit that I don't keep nearly as
> large a corpus of ham as I do spam.
>
> I have created
David Brodbeck wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> MUA's creating headers for their own internal purposes is a
>> dangerous idea. But many do it. This may be the tip of the
>> iceberg here.
>
> Sure. Sending Outlook messages with flags, do-by dates, and "urgent"
> status is an old trick. Al
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MUA's creating headers for their own internal purposes is a dangerous idea. But many do it. This may be the tip of the iceberg here.
Sure. Sending Outlook messages with flags, do-by dates, and "urgent"
status is an old trick. All those things are controlled by custo
jdow wrote:
From: "Kevin Peuhkurinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, 2004 September, 20 11:20
Subject: Re: Mozilla Headers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:40:39 -0400, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote
Mozill
From: "Kevin Peuhkurinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, 2004 September, 20 11:20
Subject: Re: Mozilla Headers
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >David Brodbeck wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:4
Folks,
I checked my last 20,000 spam emails and found that 250 of them had
bogus "X-Mozilla-Status" headers. I have found no instances of these
headers in ham, although I admit that I don't keep nearly as large a
corpus of ham as I do spam.
I have created a new bugzilla entry for this:
http:/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:40:39 -0400, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote
Mozilla Mail and Thunderbird add X-Mozilla-Status and Status2
headers to all emails they recieve. I do not believe they are ever
added to outgoing emails, even if you are forwarding
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:40:39 -0400, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote
Mozilla Mail and Thunderbird add X-Mozilla-Status and Status2
headers to all emails they recieve. I do not believe they are ever
added to outgoing emails, even if you are forwarding
David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:40:39 -0400, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote
>> Mozilla Mail and Thunderbird add X-Mozilla-Status and Status2
>> headers to all emails they recieve. I do not believe they are ever
>> added to outgoing emails, even if you are forwarding an email that
>> alrea
Hi!
Mozilla Mail and Thunderbird add X-Mozilla-Status and Status2
headers to all emails they recieve. I do not believe they are ever
added to outgoing emails, even if you are forwarding an email that
already has them.
(And the little light goes on...)
Is this why I've been receiving spam that's
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:40:39 -0400, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote
> Mozilla Mail and Thunderbird add X-Mozilla-Status and Status2
> headers to all emails they recieve. I do not believe they are ever
> added to outgoing emails, even if you are forwarding an email that
> already has them.
(And the li
Mozilla Mail and Thunderbird add X-Mozilla-Status and Status2 headers to
all emails they recieve. I do not believe they are ever added to
outgoing emails, even if you are forwarding an email that already has them.
David Hooton wrote:
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me if the following headers are ever
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me if the following headers are ever legitimately
created by a mail client?
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
I seem to be able to find them only in my spam corpus..
--
Regards,
David Hooton
13 matches
Mail list logo
