Re: Meta Operators

2006-05-02 Thread Dan
I've tried replacing the > with = meta TEST_2 (__TEST_PP + __TEST_QQ + __TEST_RR = 2) meta TEST_3 (__TEST_PP + __TEST_QQ + __TEST_RR = 3) meta TEST_4 (__TEST_PP + __TEST_QQ + __TEST_RR = 4) ...but all I get are errors: [4524] warn: _(Missing operator before 3

Re: Meta Operators

2006-05-02 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:33:53PM -0700, Dan Patnode wrote: > I've tried replacing the > with = > > meta TEST_2 (__TEST_PP + __TEST_QQ + __TEST_RR = 2) > meta TEST_3 (__TEST_PP + __TEST_QQ + __TEST_RR = 3) > meta TEST_4 (__TEST_PP + __TEST_QQ + __TEST_RR = 4) > > ...but all

Meta Operators

2006-05-01 Thread Dan Patnode
Meta's allow > operators for + sets, such as: meta TEST_2 (__TEST_PP + __TEST_QQ + __TEST_RR > 1) But when stacked into a progressive array: meta TEST_2 (__TEST_PP + __TEST_QQ + __TEST_RR > 1) meta TEST_3 (__TEST_PP + __TEST_QQ + __TEST_RR > 2) meta TEST_4 (