Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Spamass"
> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 1:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Message bypassed
>>
>> 2 Mo spam? is this a new trend? Can you put a copy somewhere
- Original Message -
From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamass"
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: Message bypassed
Jack Gostl wrote:
I was trying to figure out why a piece of spam got through with no
spamassassin headers at
At 10:42 AM 11/24/2007, Jack Gostl wrote:
Too late, its already in the bit bucket. Surprised me too. As I
said, it was just a few words with a 2mb dot bmp file. Nex time I'll
save it in case someone wants to see this piece of junk.
We were receiving some huge spams for a while from a company i
Jack Gostl wrote:
I was trying to figure out why a piece of spam got through with no
spamassassin headers at all. I finally found this message in my log:
spamc[523292]: skipped message, greater than max message size (256000
bytes)
The message was close to 2mb, including a very, very
Jack Gostl wrote:
> I was trying to figure out why a piece of spam got through with no
> spamassassin headers at all. I finally found this message in my log:
>
> spamc[523292]: skipped message, greater than max message size (256000
> bytes)
>
> The message was close to 2mb, including a very,
I was trying to figure out why a piece of spam got through with no spamassassin
headers at all. I finally found this message in my log:
spamc[523292]: skipped message, greater than max message size (256000 bytes)
The message was close to 2mb, including a very, very large bmp file. Does
anyo
