Yea, it was more meant as a "we don't use postfix specifically". My
fallback idea was also to do the filtering on the MTA we do use, instead
of in SpamAssassin.
That was just bad phrasing on my part. Sorry about that :)
On 23/07/2021 16.51, jahli...@gmx.ch wrote:
Martin,
most MTA should ha
Martin,
most MTA should have some filter capabilities. Maybe not all MTA have
same powerful and efficient ways to perform such checks as postfix has ;-)
iirc something like this should work for exim
acl_smtp_data = check_message
check_message:
deny message = 'Outscatter detected'
regex = ^X-S
We don't run Postfix here, but we can probably look for it elsewhere in
our stack instead.
Thanks to everyone that answered :)
On 23/07/2021 10.43, Laurent S. wrote:
Hi,
I know we are on the spamassassin mailing list, but another more radical
way to block those is directly in postfix with a
Hi,
I know we are on the spamassassin mailing list, but another more radical
way to block those is directly in postfix with a header_check before
giving it to spamassassin
/^X-Spam-Flag: Yes/ REJECT Outscatter
/^X-(Spam|AES)-Category: (SPAM|PHISHING)/ REJECT Outscatter
But as a forewarning, th
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 20:09:19 +0300
Henrik K wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:06:15PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:15:54PM +0200, Martin Flygenring wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a limitation to SpamAssassin so it doesn't accept
> > > looking for the two X-Spam-headers, o
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:06:15PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:15:54PM +0200, Martin Flygenring wrote:
> >
> > Is there a limitation to SpamAssassin so it doesn't accept looking for the
> > two X-Spam-headers, or can you spot why this rule isn't matching?
>
> SA removes all
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:15:54PM +0200, Martin Flygenring wrote:
>
> Is there a limitation to SpamAssassin so it doesn't accept looking for the
> two X-Spam-headers, or can you spot why this rule isn't matching?
SA removes all X-Spam-* headers from the message, it's not possible to match
on them
Martin Flygenring wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to write a rule that matches on a mail that has the
following headers:
X-Spam-Reasons: {'verdict': 'phishing',
'spamcause':
'gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddruddvgddugecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfkpffvgfftoffgfffktedpqfgfvfenuceurgh
Hi.
I'm trying to write a rule that matches on a mail that has the following
headers:
X-Spam-Reasons: {'verdict': 'phishing',
'spamcause':
'gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddruddvgddugecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfkpffvgfftoffgfffktedpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgor
