On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 08:25 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> On 5/19/2010 6:08 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> > Chris wrote:
> >>
> >> All my post contained was my scores for the spam sample he posted. Any
> >> reason how/why this happened? Here's the actual post:
> >>
> >> http://pastebin.com/gSuHGqXa
> >>
>
On 5/19/2010 6:08 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>>
>> All my post contained was my scores for the spam sample he posted. Any
>> reason how/why this happened? Here's the actual post:
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/gSuHGqXa
>>
>
>
> The scores also contain URIs that were matched against URIBLs so a
Chris wrote:
All my post contained was my scores for the spam sample he posted. Any
reason how/why this happened? Here's the actual post:
http://pastebin.com/gSuHGqXa
The scores also contain URIs that were matched against URIBLs so any
email containing them will hit again as the "spammy" U
I posted a message to the list showing how the spam containing % in the
subject scored on my system. A bit later checking my failed messages
folder I saw this:
This message was created automatically by the mail system (ecelerity).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of i