On 19/09/17 15:05, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 9/19/2017 9:11 AM, David Jones wrote:
I have had these in place for years. Maybe Kevin can consolidate and
integrate this into his KAM.cf so I could remove them or we could
eventually get them into the default SA ruleset after some testing.
Hi
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:06:58 -0500
David Jones wrote:
> header ENA_SUBJ_IS_SPACE Subject =~ /^ $/
> >>>
> >>> The OP said there was a space after 'Subject:', so that rule
> >>> wouldn't detect it.
> My point was supposed to be a single space should hit
> MISSING_SUBJECT and
On 09/19/2017 09:35 AM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:05:44 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 9/19/2017 9:11 AM, David Jones wrote:
I have had these in place for years. Maybe Kevin can consolidate
and integrate this into his KAM.cf so I could remove them or we
could eventually get them into
On 09/19/2017 09:03 AM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:32:12 -0500
David Jones wrote:
On 09/19/2017 08:20 AM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:11:03 -0500
David Jones wrote:
header ENA_SUBJ_IS_SPACE Subject =~ /^ $/
The OP said there was a space after 'Subject:', so that
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:05:44 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 9/19/2017 9:11 AM, David Jones wrote:
> > I have had these in place for years. Maybe Kevin can consolidate
> > and integrate this into his KAM.cf so I could remove them or we
> > could eventually get them into the default SA ruleset
On 9/19/2017 9:11 AM, David Jones wrote:
I have had these in place for years. Maybe Kevin can consolidate and
integrate this into his KAM.cf so I could remove them or we could
eventually get them into the default SA ruleset after some testing.
Hi David,
Thanks. In addition to KAM.cf, I mai
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:32:12 -0500
David Jones wrote:
> On 09/19/2017 08:20 AM, RW wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:11:03 -0500
> > David Jones wrote:
> >> header ENA_SUBJ_IS_SPACE Subject =~ /^ $/
> >
> > The OP said there was a space after 'Subject:', so that rule
> > wouldn'
On 09/19/2017 08:20 AM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:11:03 -0500
David Jones wrote:
On 09/19/2017 07:23 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Is it purposeful extra space though that might indicate spaminess?
Spample? Regards,
KAM
On September 19, 2017 8:13:09 AM EDT, RW
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Se
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:11:03 -0500
David Jones wrote:
> On 09/19/2017 07:23 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > Is it purposeful extra space though that might indicate spaminess?
> > Spample? Regards,
> > KAM
> >
> > On September 19, 2017 8:13:09 AM EDT, RW
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 201
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:13:09 +0100
RW wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:27:13 +0100
> Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>
> > I've had a number of emails with no subject not triggering the
> > MISSING_SUBJECT rule - only to discover that the spammers have added
> > a white space after 'Subject:'
> Some pe
On 09/19/2017 07:23 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Is it purposeful extra space though that might indicate spaminess? Spample?
Regards,
KAM
On September 19, 2017 8:13:09 AM EDT, RW wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:27:13 +0100
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I've had a number of emails with n
Is it purposeful extra space though that might indicate spaminess? Spample?
Regards,
KAM
On September 19, 2017 8:13:09 AM EDT, RW wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:27:13 +0100
>Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>
>> I've had a number of emails with no subject not triggering the
>> MISSING_SUBJECT rule - onl
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:27:13 +0100
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> I've had a number of emails with no subject not triggering the
> MISSING_SUBJECT rule - only to discover that the spammers have added
> a white space after 'Subject:' - which appears to fool the code into
> thinking that there is an act
I've had a number of emails with no subject not triggering the
MISSING_SUBJECT rule - only to discover that the spammers have added a
white space after 'Subject:' - which appears to fool the code into
thinking that there is an actual subject. Would it be possible to
'smarten up' the code a bit
14 matches
Mail list logo
