RE: Low resource rules

2007-10-01 Thread Martin.Hepworth
> Sent: 01 October 2007 14:26 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Low resource rules > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:43:55 -0500 > "John Schmerold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Problem is SA, I don't have enou

Re: Low resource rules

2007-10-01 Thread Adam Wilbraham
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:43:55 -0500 "John Schmerold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Problem is SA, I don't have enough computer to do serious content > checking. Anyone care to recommend a few rules that will tend to catch > a big chunk of the spam without sucking too much brainpower from this > VPS

Re: Low resource rules

2007-09-29 Thread Loren Wilton
Problem is SA, I don't have enough computer to do serious content checking. Anyone care to recommend a few rules that will tend to catch a big chunk of the spam without sucking too much brainpower from this VPS box? SURBL.

Low resource rules

2007-09-29 Thread John Schmerold
We use a Mailfoundry box to filter messages for our domains, we're paying for the mailfoundry per block of messages. 82% of the emails are filtered out via RBL. Rest gets blocked due to viruses and SA type issues, leaving us with 4.7% HAM - unbelievable but true. So, I got the bright idea: let's