On Tue, 30 May 2017, Robert Kudyba wrote:
I note that message hit BAYES_00. If content like that is getting a
"strong ham" Bayes score, you should review your training processes and
Bayes corpora - you *do* keep copies of messages you train Bayes with,
right? :)
Yes just re-synced.
Did you d
> For the past few days lots of missed spam has been getting through, running
>>> SA 3.4.1 on Fedora 25 with sendmail. I see that they are being tagged with
>>> URIBL_RHS_DOB, i.e., domains registered in the last five days. Since we
>>> are not running our own DN
>From: John Hardin
>On Mon, 29 May 2017, Robert Kudyba wrote:
>> For the past few days lots of missed spam has been getting through, running
>> SA 3.4.1 on Fedora 25 with sendmail. I see that they are being tagged with
>> URIBL_RHS_DOB, i.e., domains registered in t
On Mon, 29 May 2017, Robert Kudyba wrote:
For the past few days lots of missed spam has been getting through, running
SA 3.4.1 on Fedora 25 with sendmail. I see that they are being tagged with
URIBL_RHS_DOB, i.e., domains registered in the last five days. Since we
are not running our own DNS
For the past few days lots of missed spam has been getting through, running
SA 3.4.1 on Fedora 25 with sendmail. I see that they are being tagged with
URIBL_RHS_DOB, i.e., domains registered in the last five days. Since we
are not running our own DNS server (yet--need permission from our CISO
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I turned off Bayes tests temporarily and it had little effect.
This seems a bit odd. That bayes_00 should have been good for about -3
points. Backing out Bayes should have raised the scores on this stuff by
around 3 points, which with only a little bi
* Leigh Sharpe wrote (29/06/06 03:03):
This was my first suspicion. I turned off Bayes tests temporarily and
it had little effect. I'm seriously considering resetting the bayes
and starting again
I can recommend that. I had a situation a while ago where the bayes
database got mysteriously cor
> I turned off Bayes tests temporarily and it had little effect.
This seems a bit odd. That bayes_00 should have been good for about -3
points. Backing out Bayes should have raised the scores on this stuff by
around 3 points, which with only a little bit of help should be tipping them
into spam.
:08
PM
Subject: Lots of missed spam
Hi
All,
After 6 months or
more of perfect operation, I have had heaps of spam has been missed over the
last few weeks. Running SA with -D option shows nothing obvious in the
logs.
A small selection of misses
is posted here:
http
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:55:07PM -0700, jdow wrote:
> >1) all of this spam is hitting BAYES_00.. you really should check your
> >bayes training and correct it.
>
> THAT is a bad thing. Getting down to BAYES_00 for spam takes some
> doing. At the very least a whole lot of spam got trained as ham.
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Leigh Sharpe wrote:
> I'm seriously considering resetting the bayes and starting again,
> but this time I'll be making sure that it only gets fed by people
> who are actually competent enough to put their spam in the spam
> folder and ham in the ham folder, not the other way a
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:57 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lots of missed spam
Leigh you have a large boatload of spam trained as ham. Make sure your
users realize that GOOD messages train as ham and BAD messages train as
spam. It appears at least one perso
Leigh you have a large boatload of spam trained as ham. Make sure your
users realize that GOOD messages train as ham and BAD messages train as
spam. It appears at least one person has been feeding them both to the
ham training.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Leigh Sharpe" <[EMAIL PROT
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Leigh Sharpe wrote:
Hi All,
After 6 months or more of perfect operation, I have had heaps of spam
has been missed over the last few weeks. Running SA with -D option
shows nothing obvious in the logs.
A small selection of misses is posted here:
http://www
ECTED]
web www.pacificwireless.com.au
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:55 AM
To: Leigh Sharpe
Cc: users
Subject: Re: Lots of missed spam
Leigh Sharpe wrote:
> Hi All,
> After 6 months or more of perfect operation, I have had heaps of spam
&
Leigh Sharpe wrote:
> Hi All,
> After 6 months or more of perfect operation, I have had heaps of spam
> has been missed over the last few weeks. Running SA with -D option
> shows nothing obvious in the logs.
> A small selection of misses is posted here:
> http://www.pacificwireless.com.au/spam/
>
Hi
All,
After 6 months or
more of perfect operation, I have had heaps of spam has been missed over the
last few weeks. Running SA with -D option shows nothing obvious in the
logs.
A small selection of misses is posted
here:
http://www.pacificwireless.com.au/spam/
Anybody got any
ideas wh
17 matches
Mail list logo
