Dan Mahoney, System Admin said:
>
> By the way, the defaults are usually pretty decent (and get way better
> once the bayes magic starts working). Perhaps you should look at WHY ham
> is being caught, and be sure to teach your users how to properly whitelist
> their mail if there's a problem. Th
Quoting "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all. Ive been lurking for a week or two hoping to learn something,
but I think my starting knowledge is too far behind!
I have a Redhat server running sendmail 8.12 that can pre-installed w
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, scohen wrote:
Yup. Fat-fingers strike again.
-Dan
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
If it's a system-wide install, then you should find your config file (on a
default install of spamassassin it's /etc/mail/spamassassin/local/cf I
believe -- but DOUBLE CHEC
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> If it's a system-wide install, then you should find your config file (on a
> default install of spamassassin it's /etc/mail/spamassassin/local/cf I
> believe -- but DOUBLE CHECK).
>
I believe it is /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf not local/cf
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all. Ive been lurking for a week or two hoping to learn something,
but I think my starting knowledge is too far behind!
I have a Redhat server running sendmail 8.12 that can pre-installed with
spamassassin. Ive never used spamassassin before, an
Hello all. Ive been lurking for a week or two hoping to learn something,
but I think my starting knowledge is too far behind!
I have a Redhat server running sendmail 8.12 that can pre-installed with
spamassassin. Ive never used spamassassin before, and Im a sysadmin who
going by the trial by fir
