You are correct Pedro, the curly-braces solution does work. I will
integrate the solution, I leave it to you guys to determine if a bug
should be opened and with whom.
On 2018-08-31 15:01, Pedro David Marco wrote:
It works with Perl 5.14.2 but not with 5.20.2
It seems that Perl preprocessor d
It works with Perl 5.14.2 but not with 5.20.2
It seems that Perl preprocessor does something with repeated chars before the
regex engine that makes it consider it wrongly
if i change ss for s{2} like this:
body __Z_NEGATIVE_LOOKBEHIND /(?On Friday, August 31, 2018, 4:00:05 PM GMT+2, Ol
Likely best to try against svn for 3.4 and trunk where I expect it will
fail and we have to open a bug.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 10:42 RW wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:59:52 -0400
> Olivier Coutu wrote:
>
> > I wrote a rule that throws a /variable length lookbehind/ error where
> > the lookbehind
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:59:52 -0400
Olivier Coutu wrote:
> I wrote a rule that throws a /variable length lookbehind/ error where
> the lookbehind is fixed length. Here is a MWE:
>
> body __Z_NEGATIVE_LOOKBEHIND /(?
> spamassassin --siteconfigpath=${HOME}/sa-rules/ --lint
> aoû 31 09:
I wrote a rule that throws a /variable length lookbehind/ error where
the lookbehind is fixed length. Here is a MWE:
body __Z_NEGATIVE_LOOKBEHIND /(?The error goes away if I remove the case insensitive, or if I put a
character between the two /s/ characters. Using /nn/ instead of /s
Thomas Bolioli wrote:
> I am running sa w/lint and it never sees the email I am passing to it.
> the cmd line is:
> spamassassin -D --lint < email
> and the output is always:
>
> snip...
> [29845] dbg: check: is spam? score=2.216 required=6
> [29845] dbg: check:
> tests=MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJ
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 03:44:35PM -0500, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
> I am running sa w/lint and it never sees the email I am passing to it.
> the cmd line is:
> spamassassin -D --lint < email
> and the output is always:
>
> Which leads me to believe the email is not getting read by SA. Any
> thought
I am running sa w/lint and it never sees the email I am passing to it.
the cmd line is:
spamassassin -D --lint < email
and the output is always:
snip...
[29845] dbg: check: is spam? score=2.216 required=6
[29845] dbg: check:
tests=MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_REAL_NAME,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAY
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 01:09:25PM -0700, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Hello The,
>
> Sunday, October 23, 2005, 5:54:05 AM, you wrote:
>
> TD> I am using rules du Jour and now I am getting
>
> TD> ...
> The basic local.cf errors have already been answered.
> TD> [2136] warn: config: warning: score s
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 10:16:33PM +0200, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> On one of my systems i had the saem, and this was solved by enabling the
> right modules in de init.pre.
Hrm. Can you open up a bugzilla ticket about this? The FUZZY_* rule
scores are supposed to be wrapped in "ifplugin" chec
Hi!
TD> [2136] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule
FUZZY_GUARANTEE
TD> ...
The FUZZY_xxx rules are new with SA 3.1.0 -- it looks like you've
somehow managed to include the scores file for these rules, but not
the primary rules file. Your installation seems to be incomplete.
Hello The,
Sunday, October 23, 2005, 5:54:05 AM, you wrote:
TD> I am using rules du Jour and now I am getting
TD> ...
The basic local.cf errors have already been answered.
TD> [2136] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule
FUZZY_GUARANTEE
TD> ...
The FUZZY_xxx rules are new with
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:57:30AM -0400, JamesDR wrote:
> defang_mime - just remove it
> report_header - use add_header
> use_terse_report - again, use add_header
> detailed_phrase_score - not sure
> spam_level_stars - use add_header
> pyzor_add_header - not sure
>
> --
> Thanks,
> JamesDR
Got
The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 07:28:50AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:05:31AM -0400, RoNNY wrote:
On 10/23/05, The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[2136] warn: lint: 43 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled for more
information
The last li
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 07:28:50AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:05:31AM -0400, RoNNY wrote:
> > On 10/23/05, The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > [2136] warn: lint: 43 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled
> > > for more information
> >
> > The last
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:05:31AM -0400, RoNNY wrote:
> On 10/23/05, The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [2136] warn: lint: 43 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled for
> > more information
>
> The last line of your log gives a pretty good idea as to what you
> should do next
On 10/23/05, The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [2136] warn: lint: 43 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled for
> more information
The last line of your log gives a pretty good idea as to what you
should do next...
-RoNNY
Excellent - big typo in my meta rule.
I had spelt BAYES as BAYNES.
Thanx Anthony.
Dp.
On 7 Apr 2005 at 13:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think your problems lie here:
>
>
>
> warning: description exists for non-existent rule
> ANTI_BAYES_SPAMCOP_00 warning: description exists for
Hi,
I think your problems lie here:
warning: description exists for non-existent rule ANTI_BAYES_SPAMCOP_00
warning: description exists for non-existent rule
ANTI_BAYES_SPAMCOP_40
warning: description exists for non-existent rule
ANTI_BAYES_SPAMCOP_05
warning: description exists for non-exis
hi,
SA 3.0.0 with exim-acl
I ran spamassassin -D --lint after making a change to the local.cf
and noticed the following:
debug:
tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_40,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_REAL_NAM
E
debug:
subtests=__HAS_MSGID,__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__SANE_MSGID,__
UNUSABLE_MSGID
20 matches
Mail list logo
