Re: config no subject rewrite, learning spam headers

2009-02-20 Thread Ray
RW googlemail.com> writes: > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:00:03 + (UTC) > Ray misinformation.org> wrote: > > * How do I determine what the current SA config is? > > The locations where spamassassin looks for configuration are listed in > the main manpage. I managed to find the config directory on

Re: config no subject rewrite, learning spam headers

2009-02-20 Thread RW
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:00:03 + (UTC) Ray wrote: > However, SA currently appears to be making spam > judgement and to be bayes autolearning. (A reasonable default setup > from the hosting provider.) > > * How do I determine what the current SA config is? The locations where spamassassin loo

config no subject rewrite, learning spam headers

2009-02-19 Thread Ray
I just moved to a new hosting provider who has Spamassassin 3.2.4 running (on some kind of Linux, 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5) and I'm otherwise unfamiliar with SA. I'd like some degree of control over what SA is doing, but config for this is proving confusing for me. Ideally if I could get SA just to mark

Re: Learning SPAM

2008-12-19 Thread Luis Croker
Hi... I have fixed the problem... I dont know if this is the best method...I have copied the following files, from the old server to the new server... mailgw# pwd /var/amavis/.spamassassin mailgw# ls -al total 25298 drwx-- 2 vscan vscan 512 Dec 19 11:31 . drwxr-x--

Re: Learning SPAM

2008-12-18 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Luis Croker wrote: I have been looking in my files... and the logs show me that the rules BAYES_* (BAYES_00.. BAYES_99) are not doing match in the mails... I mean... these rules are not being used... Is BAYES_50 the only BAYES rule you see hitting? That means your baye

Re: Learning SPAM

2008-12-18 Thread Luis Croker
I have been looking in my files... and the logs show me that the rules BAYES_* (BAYES_00.. BAYES_99) are not doing match in the mails... I mean... these rules are not being used... How can i try to do Amavis uses these rules ? Thanks. On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 15:07 -0800, Evan Pla

Re: Learning SPAM

2008-12-18 Thread Evan Platt
Luis Croker wrote: I have a question... I have configured a mail server with Postfix+spamassassin+amavis. The server is working very good and blocking well. I have installed another server... with the same procedure... and I have the same rules, configuration files... I mean, everything i

Learning SPAM

2008-12-18 Thread Luis Croker
Hi all I have a question... I have configured a mail server with Postfix +spamassassin+amavis. The server is working very good and blocking well. I have installed another server... with the same procedure... and I have the same rules, configuration files... I mean, everything is ex

Re: Learning Spam-Error? [signed]

2007-07-15 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:34:59AM +0900, Matthias Schmidt [c] wrote: > Learning SPAM... > archive-iterator: invalid (undef) format in target list, 2 at /Library/ > Perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator.pm line 724, line 1. That's a known issue for 3.1, 3.1.10 (rsn) will fi

Learning Spam-Error? [signed]

2007-07-15 Thread Matthias Schmidt [c]
Hello, while learning Spam I get these errors: Learning SPAM... archive-iterator: invalid (undef) format in target list, 2 at /Library/ Perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator.pm line 724, line 1. and I also get this error from spamassasin: /bin/sh: line 1: periodic: command not found any

Re: best practise on learning spam

2005-10-02 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Freitag, 30. September 2005 23:36 mouss wrote: >>I have an IMAP folder with 1500 spams. I convert it to a mbox format > why? >     sa-learn --spam $dir > works sa-learn does not report to the online databases dcc/pyzor/razor. If you refer to sa-learn against IMAP: How to do it with cyrus? How

Re: best practise on learning spam

2005-09-30 Thread mouss
Michael Monnerie a écrit : Performance question: I have an IMAP folder with 1500 spams. I convert it to a mbox format why? sa-learn --spam $dir works file, and want to learn this as spam. From what I see spamassassin --mbox is much quicker on learning such big files than formail -n 3

best practise on learning spam

2005-09-30 Thread Michael Monnerie
Performance question: I have an IMAP folder with 1500 spams. I convert it to a mbox format file, and want to learn this as spam. From what I see spamassassin --mbox is much quicker on learning such big files than formail -n 3 -s spamc -u zmi -L spam from that file (even tried -n 1 to -n 10). Can