RW googlemail.com> writes:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:00:03 + (UTC)
> Ray misinformation.org> wrote:
> > * How do I determine what the current SA config is?
>
> The locations where spamassassin looks for configuration are listed in
> the main manpage.
I managed to find the config directory on
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:00:03 + (UTC)
Ray wrote:
> However, SA currently appears to be making spam
> judgement and to be bayes autolearning. (A reasonable default setup
> from the hosting provider.)
>
> * How do I determine what the current SA config is?
The locations where spamassassin loo
I just moved to a new hosting provider who has Spamassassin 3.2.4 running (on
some kind of Linux, 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5) and I'm otherwise unfamiliar with SA.
I'd like some degree of control over what SA is doing, but config for this is
proving confusing for me.
Ideally if I could get SA just to mark
Hi...
I have fixed the problem... I dont know if this is the best
method...I have copied the following files, from the old server to
the new server...
mailgw# pwd
/var/amavis/.spamassassin
mailgw# ls -al
total 25298
drwx-- 2 vscan vscan 512 Dec 19 11:31 .
drwxr-x--
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Luis Croker wrote:
I have been looking in my files... and the logs show me that the
rules BAYES_* (BAYES_00.. BAYES_99) are not doing match in the mails...
I mean... these rules are not being used...
Is BAYES_50 the only BAYES rule you see hitting? That means your baye
I have been looking in my files... and the logs show me that the
rules BAYES_* (BAYES_00.. BAYES_99) are not doing match in the mails...
I mean... these rules are not being used...
How can i try to do Amavis uses these rules ?
Thanks.
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 15:07 -0800, Evan Pla
Luis Croker wrote:
I have a question... I have configured a mail server with
Postfix+spamassassin+amavis. The server is working very good and
blocking well. I have installed another server... with the same
procedure... and I have the same rules, configuration files...
I mean, everything i
Hi all
I have a question... I have configured a mail server with Postfix
+spamassassin+amavis. The server is working very good and blocking
well. I have installed another server... with the same procedure... and
I have the same rules, configuration files...
I mean, everything is ex
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:34:59AM +0900, Matthias Schmidt [c] wrote:
> Learning SPAM...
> archive-iterator: invalid (undef) format in target list, 2 at /Library/
> Perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator.pm line 724, line 1.
That's a known issue for 3.1, 3.1.10 (rsn) will fi
Hello,
while learning Spam I get these errors:
Learning SPAM...
archive-iterator: invalid (undef) format in target list, 2 at /Library/
Perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator.pm line 724, line 1.
and I also get this error from spamassasin:
/bin/sh: line 1: periodic: command not found
any
On Freitag, 30. September 2005 23:36 mouss wrote:
>>I have an IMAP folder with 1500 spams. I convert it to a mbox format
> why?
> sa-learn --spam $dir
> works
sa-learn does not report to the online databases dcc/pyzor/razor.
If you refer to sa-learn against IMAP: How to do it with cyrus? How
Michael Monnerie a écrit :
Performance question:
I have an IMAP folder with 1500 spams. I convert it to a mbox format
why?
sa-learn --spam $dir
works
file, and want to learn this as spam. From what I see
spamassassin --mbox
is much quicker on learning such big files than
formail -n 3
Performance question:
I have an IMAP folder with 1500 spams. I convert it to a mbox format
file, and want to learn this as spam. From what I see
spamassassin --mbox
is much quicker on learning such big files than
formail -n 3 -s spamc -u zmi -L spam
from that file (even tried -n 1 to -n 10). Can
13 matches
Mail list logo